Subject: RE: Denial
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:10:14 +0200
From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl>


Ah Henk, i only now see that you call me "someone".

Why do you do that, Henk? 

In case you attribute to me "blind adoration", why don't
you oppose to me materially? Not everything i write,
can be good, or true. Don't you want to help another
human being?

your rene



-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Henk van Tuijl [mailto:hvtuijl-AT-xs4all.nl]
Verzonden: maandag 22 september 2003 14:54
Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU
Onderwerp: Denial


Someone wrote the following:

> We do now have two extremely dangerous, blinding, propositions:

> "Heidegger was a Nazi"
> "Heidegger wrote "Origin of work of art" in 1935"

Well, he was and he wrote ... So what?

I can understand that those who blindly adore Heidegger would want to deny
that he was a Nazi but why would they want to deny that he wrote the Origin?

Henk


Henk,

I did and do not deny them. I also don't affirm them, unless in a superficial
sense. H became party member when he decided to do the rector job. 
And to the other: 
Say '1935' and what comes up: Hitler or Heidegger? Or both? But Hitler
has nothing to do with The Origin. So can you explain to me what he's doing
here when the Origin is mentioned? 

Rene




     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---