Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:19:23 +0100 Subject: Re: Denial From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk> on 22/9/03 5:52 pm, Henk van Tuijl at hvtuijl-AT-xs4all.nl wrote: > Oppose what? Heidegger apologetics? Since no one denies any longer that > Heidegger was a Nazi, there is nothing to oppose. Henk, should we not be asking here on this list of all lists what "was" means? It's not a matter of opposition but of position, of shifting shuffling edging into the fit; what does the statement *say* (as opposed [!] to what it speaks)? A whole notion of history or histories lies haunting this seemingly obvious statement of so-called fact; i.e., shouldn't we on this list be discussing what statements of fact *are*, the be-ing of facticity, how facts *are*? Not a matter of apologogetics [!] or denials or accusations or supportings (etc), but what? thinking? perhaps... regards michaelP --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005