File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0309, message 291


Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:19:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Denial
From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk>


on 22/9/03 5:52 pm, Henk van Tuijl at hvtuijl-AT-xs4all.nl wrote:

> Oppose what? Heidegger apologetics? Since no one denies any longer that
> Heidegger was a Nazi, there is nothing to oppose.

Henk, should we not be asking here on this list of all lists what "was"
means? It's not a matter of opposition but of position, of shifting
shuffling edging into the fit; what does the statement *say* (as opposed [!]
to what it speaks)? A whole notion of history or histories lies haunting
this seemingly obvious statement of so-called fact; i.e., shouldn't we on
this list be discussing what statements of fact *are*, the be-ing of
facticity, how facts *are*? Not a matter of apologogetics [!] or denials or
accusations or supportings (etc), but what? thinking? perhaps...

regards

michaelP



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005