From: "Henk van Tuijl" <hvtuijl-AT-xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: undenial Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:23:04 +0200 From: "michaelP" <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk> To: <heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: undenial > on 22/9/03 11:34 pm, Henk van Tuijl at hvtuijl-AT-xs4all.nl wrote: > > > "Heidegger was a Nazi" tells us what Heidegger became after his return to > > Freiburg and how he did understand himself from that moment on. He could > > have become a member of the Bekennende Kirche or could have remained an > > outsider but that was not his understanding of himself. > > Henk, of course I and everyone else knows what the statement speaks in that > way... but what about in a genuinely philosophical, or better, thinkerly > way, is what I meant (after all, to the Judites' chagrin, Heidegger spent > his entire life working up that question, so viewing such statements with > everyday shallowness does not bespeak well of TheList ). > > Anyone dig deeper? My reference to Clinton was meant to illustrate that it is pure sophistry to put the question of being in relation to Heidegger's Nazism. I'm am sorry to notice that even this simple remark was - already - far too deep for you to understand. It is obvious that you have no clue what Heidegger's philosophy is about. I leave your to your senseless mantra's. Henk --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005