File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0309, message 307


Subject: RE: Tudor's Bowels
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:39:13 +0200
From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl>




-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: GEVANS613-AT-aol.com [mailto:GEVANS613-AT-aol.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 23 september 2003 13:28
Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU
Onderwerp: Tudor's Bowels


on 20/9/03 6:01 pm, GEVANS613-AT-aol.com at GEVANS613-AT-aol.com wrote:

Better tell The Priest of On that if he has an atomic reactor up his arse to 
be very careful when he goes to the John
- it could make a terrible mess of Holland!

The Einstein of Sandwich writes:

In other words, the increase in (kinetic) energy due to motion is equivalent 
to an increase in mass given by the Lorentzian Transformation (equally 
responsible for the changes in length and duration experienced by an observer in 
relative motion to the observed; the important point being that these are NOT 
changes in the observed, that length, duration and mass are not invariant features 
of the observed at all, but relative to the observer's state of motion).

Jud: 
I have no scatological interest in Tudor's bowel movements other than the 
fact that he curiously insists that his 
digestion is in some way similar to an A Bomb.

  All the ridicule falls back on you: YOU say everything and everybody consists
  of atoms. But Tudor has to pay for your uneducatedness. Your what?? Ok, we
  agree, nothing existent, less than nothing. 'Bowels', 'priest of On' :
  what a filth you're showing, can get worse? 






 Now you introduce the 
complication of a motion, and I would certainly not risk being anywhere in the 
vicinity while he passed one, nor would I be interested in the the increase in 
(kinetic) energy of Tudor's sphincter due  to any increase in the mass of the motion 
that was passed or passing.  Neither would I be interested in observing the 
changes in the length of that which was past or passing,  or the duration 
experienced by me as a putative observer in relation to the evacuatory event. In 
other words there would be no 'observer's motility at all - the observer would 
be sitting at home in his imitation-leather armchair doing The Times crossword.

Oh!  I nearly forgot to mention - Heidegger was a Nazi!


   You are a repulsive little child. Treatable though, that makes it even more
   pathetic.





     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005