From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: SHOW ME THE TEXT - was Essence of Modern Technolgy
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:18:34 +0000


Rene de Bakker wrote:

> >Ok, I would like you to show how this follows from Heidegger's 
>fundamental
> >ontology.
> >
> >    It does NOT. I tried to explain to you that after BT something 
> >revolutionary
> >    happens. What ground itself is, is going to be the question. GA26 and 
> >the
> >    death of Scheler.
>
>Give me that text. What work is it? Or can you post it?
>
>
>    Which one? Couple of days I named again: Vom Wesen des Grundes
>   (Malik: the first small book of the philosophers of the future).
>    The essence of ground: (as) what ground *is*.
>    Or mean GA26? I've written kilometers on it here! The GA on Leibniz
>   (1st pt), and on onticity (remember?), the strange review on BT,    
>intentionality and freedom.    GA26 and "The essence of ground" are to be 
>read together.

Well I definitely have The Essence of Ground. Give me a specific text and 
let's go over it.

>    "The essence of ground" and "What is METAphysics" are to be read
>    together.
>    Then: GA29/30: here is the beginning of the Kehre. Still ambiguous,
>    but that can't be else. The 'revolutionary' article of van Dijk -
>    recognized as such by Coriando and now by all Freiburg - , is on
>    GA29/30, but it's quite difficult. First read Oudemans article
>    "Heidegger's 'logical investigations'" (and: "Reading against the 
>grain")
>    on the period before 1929.
>
>    how come so benommen? the Guinness?

I personally hate Guinness. Tastes like coffee mixed with beer.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now 
FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---