From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Essence of Modern Technolgy
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:13:26 +0000


Rene de Bakker wrote:

>	>           Don't you tell me what to do. I  SEE Blair. Cheney and all he 
>others
>	>lying. You don't.
>
>	Rene, you can't even SEE something as simple as that accusing someone of
>	being limited to truth as correctness depends on the very o/o distinction
>	that you tried to blur in the first place. Otherwise you wouldn't have
>	repeated the same mistake 5 months later.
>
>	             See other post with textual evidence (reliable rendering by 
>me)
>	             Lying and widerwille cannot hide completely. I saw it and 
>said it.
>	             They could have found something all the time, but they just 
>didn't.

You know, I've gotten used to having to repeat "read resolution 1441" to 
John, but I thought you would have checked paragraph 3 out for yourself by 
now, because items from that paragraph HAVE been found, which put Iraq in 
explicit material breach of a UN resolution which the UN subsequently 
ignored (due to their own machinations, machinations which you mysteriously 
did NOT condemn), not to mention the numerous Iraqi breaches every time they 
went into the no-fly zone throughout the 90s. Not to mention that Iraqi 
crimes against humanity far surpassed those in Bosnia - did you condemn that 
war? And that war was also done without UN authority, as Annan himself 
complained at its outset. Not to mention this ridiculous supposed 
"Straussian" influence, ridiculous because the former president (hardly a 
Straussian) said and did the same thing in Bosnia and Iraq.

Checked your vision lately?

>	In that case, Powell is your man. He was even pro-UN - at first, until he
>	ran right into all the machinations at work there which he had mistaken 
>for
>	sincere concern for the world before. He was even against the FIRST gulf
>	war. So he WAS where you are now. And he was in the trenches too.
>
>
>
>	     Yeh, and he had to do the lying. You could see the widerwille on his 
>face.
>	     He also seems to have reservation towards Wolfowitz. I've read one 
>interview
>	     by the last, and find it worrying. That's all  my textual evidence.

Careful, because twice before, the history of your accuracy regarding 
Wolfowitz interviews has been demonstrated to be quite ... spotty.

>	     Btw, did you ever see Kissinger on tv, some time after the attack?
>	     According to Schmitt, Kissinger belongs to those who 'know'.
>	      What could that be?

Obviously he must be a Straussian.

>	      >       Older people had gods there too. Would you ask Homer the 
>same question?
>	>       Achilles dragging the body of Hektor around Troja, before the eyes 
>of
>	>Priamos,   is that mitsein? Yeh, they do it apparently with each other, 
>and so do
>	>etc.     You're  using existentials as sea mines.
>
>	    Only against those who do not SEE what they are by mistaking them for 
>ontic
>	   driftwood.
>
>	          They're the only things to hold on.
>
>	         The ontological is not a separate realm.

Never said it was. But there is still a different without a difference 
between them, as Heidegger himself said in your GA 29/30 text.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Help protect your PC.  Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---