Subject: RE: [fyi] What is Realism in Iraq? Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:40:15 +0100 From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU [mailto:owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU]Namens John Foster Verzonden: maandag 17 november 2003 18:07 Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU Onderwerp: Re: [fyi] What is Realism in Iraq? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl> To: <heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 7:03 AM Subject: RE: [fyi] What is Realism in Iraq? > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU > [mailto:owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU]Namens Anthony > Crifasi > Verzonden: maandag 17 november 2003 15:50 > Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU > Onderwerp: RE: [fyi] What is Realism in Iraq? > > > Rene de Bakker wrote: > > ??? it was either you or me, and it wasn't me, so..... > > > Heidegger and Japan did go well together, on account of deeper things > >than > > political. (are you familiar with the term 'philosophical'?) > > And the west and Iraq have no common philosophical roots? Where did the west > inherit Greek philosophy from in the first place? The Islamics. > > Anthony Crifasi > > > > Please go tell mr Wolfowitz, where the roots of his 'philosophy' lie. > (cf. Abraham and the Bagdad museum of archaeology) > > The Greeks developed their own in contrast with the Asian. Goethe, Nietzsche > and Heidegger were aware of that. > The Islamic reroute of a part of Aristotle's works, is, compared to this, > merely a traffic question. > > rene It must have been Plotinus then were the roots of Western Philosophy came from. At that time may be he had a conference with Sankara's followers? Plotinus was in the Arab world for a while. john John, A situation resembling Rilke and Americanism: what Rilke thought he was opposing, determined already his grandparents. Although Abelard already "guessed" the remaining works of A. (according to De Rijk), the disposal of the entire Aristoteles led to a crisis of Western christendom. No longer, Greek 'eternity' (physis) of the earth, was compatible with God's freedom to create. Sigher van Brabant and his doctrine of double truth (peaceful coexistence between opposing truths of faith and philosophy), the most radical Aristotelism of that day, were condemned, but more, incl. Thomas himself, were involved. Interestingly, the writers of Empire consider Duns Scotus' doctrine of the univocity of being, which was to unite finite, earthly, and infinite, godly, being, the real beginning of modern philosophy: the universal notion of ens as the basis of all religious controversy. The feeding ground for all these developments was, however, already laid, and consisted in the merging of Judaeo-Christian monotheism and Greek metaphysics, translated into Latin. Plotinus (204-270) is an important station on this road. regards rene --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005