Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:50:57 +0800
Subject: Re: Gestell
From: Malcolm Riddoch <m.riddoch-AT-ecu.edu.au>



On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 06:20  PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:

> There is a plethora of specific texts to back up Michael's reply that 
> Gestell requires mathematical control and lawlike determination to 
> some specific outcome, not mere tendency towards some outcome. So 
> unless you know of some text that says otherwise, your interpretation 
> of Gestell as subsuming non-determinate social relations is as dubious 
> as your former comments about anxiety.

Really? Why do you bother with this sort of dubious debate?

mr



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---