From: HealantHenry-AT-aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:28:32 EST
Subject: Re: FYI: Richard Perle conceded that the invasion of Iraq had been illegal



In a message dated 11/20/03 11:25:22 AM, crifasi-AT-hotmail.com writes:

>Well either it was against international law or not. If it was, do you
>deny 
>that international law can stand in the way as he describes, not due to
>the 
>law itself, but due to "French intransigence" which meant there had been
>'no 
>practical mechanism consistent with the rules of the UN for dealing with
>
>Saddam Hussein'" (see 3 paragraphs down below)? In that case, simply 
>pointing out that it was against international law would say nothing either
>
>way. But if it was not against international law, then there is no problem.


Ha ha ha!!!  I just knew you would blame it on the French.


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---