Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:49:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Liberal vs. social democracy - Gestell/Gewinnst
From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk>


on 20/11/03 6:06 pm, HealantHenry-AT-aol.com at HealantHenry-AT-aol.com wrote
responding to MichaelE:

> This appears to me to be descriptive of
> the Gestell phenomena.

Hen, is it not the case that the phenomena of gestell are not gestell it
self? Is it not the case that it is gestell that brings forward the
phenomena in the form that we mark as gestell as if the two were the same?
To look for signs and traces of gestell is it self under the dominance of
gestell; this does not provide the essence of gestell... so what manner of
comportment does such provision, such pro-vision?

regards

michaelP




     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---