File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0312, message 51


From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: Why did the United States invade and destabilize Iraq?
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:35:13 +0000


John Foster wrote:

>Anthony:
> > You would have been beheaded in Iraq for such heresies. But not anymore.
>
>Where did you get this generalization?
>  Where does it say in the Koran that the soul is immortal?

The following is a list:

A. Death: (3:185), (4:78), (21:35), (33:19), (56:83-87).
B. Resurrection: (17:49-52), (16:38-40), (19:66-72), (22:5), (46:33-34), 
(29:20), (79:10-14).
C. Accounting Of Deeds: (17:13-15), (18:49), (83:7-9), (83:18-21), 
(84:7-15).
D. Heaven: (55:46-77), (76:12-22), (78:31-35), (88:10-16).
1. Inhabitants: (98:7-8).
2. Parents United With Offspring: (52:21).
3. Food: (52:22-23), (83:24-28).
4. Spouses And Mates: (2:25), (3:15), (55:56), (56:22-23).
5. Rivers: (47:15).
E. Hell: (15:44), (67:7-8).
1. Inhabitants: (39:71-72), (5:10), (5:72-74), (8:36), (9:34-35), (9:63), 
(9:68), (19:69), (25:11), (40:60), (48:6).
2. Punishment: (4:56), (7:41), (7:50), (14:16-17), (14:49-50), (22:19-22), 
(40:71-72), (54:48).
3. Food: (44:43-49), (47:12), (69:36-37), (73:13), (77:30-33), (88:5-7).

>Anthony
> > 33.1 million immigrants disagree.
>
>That's because nobody else would accept them. We Canadians only take in the
>best first. The US has to take in the second rate ones....economic 
>refugees.
>We take in true refugees on humanitarian grounds and educated immigrants.

My mother had two college degrees from Thailand. Does she count?

>You get all the causalities of Ur own wars, especially Vietnam a several
>decades ago. Pretty well had to didn't cha?

Um, they were running from the glorious North. Pretty well had to didn't 
they?

>We took Boat People in here
>without even thinking. Gave them houses to live in, jobs when they arrived,
>et cetera. But we can only take in so many, about 250,000 per year which is
>the highest rate in the world on a per capita basis.
>
>That makes us the richest and most generous nation in the world; at least 3
>times more popular and richer than the US. The US is bankrupt...morally,
>economically and spiritually. It is a dead concept....suffering from social
>and existential scherosis. Walmart is the emblem of the US.
>
>No body likes the US.

33.1 million immigrants disagree.

>Only Tony Blair likes the US, and everyone else is
>intimidated into supporting the US up to a point. Look at Angola. It was on
>the UN Security Council. It cannot vote against the position of the US
>because it has signatory to an economic aid package which prohibits it from
>'not supporting US foreign policy'....
>
>Which means that the only friends the US has are those who are paid to be
>friends. Look at Mexico and Canada. Did we go to war with the US and kill
>thousands of civilians in Iraq?
>
>Of course not, and we never did this for the US for over 50 years. In fact
>we have never done this for the US ever. We have 2000 support troops in
>Afghanistan because we are members of NATO who is active in Afghanistan.

Well thanks for supporting.

>Sorry young Yanks, we do not support you in your expansion of terror.
>Attendez vous du gare du vietnam, "we are not afraid of you."

Bui Tin.

> > >well it is late
> > >but not oo late
> >
> > It is for Andrea.
>
>No you got it wrong again. Her 4 children are now dead. She was a Texan and
>killed her kids by drowning them in a bathtub. She said it was the 
>Christian
>thing to do because she wanted that they go to heaven before Satan could
>claim them on earth here.
>
>Her lawyers are going to appeal the verdict on the grounds that she was
>psychotic (either due to post partum depression, or some other form of
>psychosis which may be treatable). Afterall she was the class 
>valedictorian,
>swim team champion, and a registered nurse.

And I'm the illogical one.

>Why did Bush invade Iraq?
>
>You still have not answered this question.

Canada saved me the trouble:

"Military action by the United Kingdom, United States and coalition partners 
against Iraq was precipitated by persistent concerns regarding Iraq's 
PROBABLE STOCKS OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS and fears that it may 
have resumed a nuclear weapons development programme."

>U mumbled something about saving
>the Iraqi people and liberating them, but they are not liberated, nor were
>they saved.....

When did I mumble that?

>How can the Iraqi's be saved by the Amerikans if they cannot speak the same
>language and the only thing the Amerikans are interest in is the oil. That
>is the only language that Bush understands, is money, and oil. Two simple
>words on Bush can fully understand.

The Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade disagrees 
with you.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the 
FREE McAfee online computer scan! 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005