From: GEVANS613-AT-aol.com Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:38:21 EST Subject: Re: all or nothing at all, part 4 In a message dated 03/11/2004 15:17:21 GMT Standard Time, michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk writes: An other way to not answer the question as to why there is something and not rather nothing is by not asking it through the diversion of making the groundless claim that the very question is meaningless. An other a-voidance to a-voidmerely a trumped up version of unquestioning tradition); at the very heart of this question, this question that shifts the ground of the ground of all our questions, our answers, our pronouncements, our common-fucking-sense (merely a trumped up version of unquestioning tradition); Jud: Nominalistic commonsense is NOT merely a trumped up version of unquestioning tradition, for the tradition questions such stupid questions whilst the nominalist answers such stupid questions. *Nothing* [No-thing} doesn't exist. If you can provide proof that *nothing* exists, or that *Being* is an act uality rather than a trannie fantasy, you will become better known than Leonardo de Vinci. Somehow I cannot see that happening. Anyway how do YOU know that your precious *Being* which turns up in Heideggerian writings like a bad penny every other line or so is real? Who told you that there is such a non-existent *phenomena,* and by what authority does Heidegger speak of *Being,* other than by the brainwashing he received from Jesuits as a child? Why do you deflect other more reasoned explanations and keep bringing the investigation back to the groundless claims and inauthentic notion of *Being* all the time, and fall back continually on introducing the ploy of *the void* and the *abyss* and other weirdo stuff redolent of fairy stories, or of melodramatic Victorian romantic fiction peppered with foul Heideggerian skinhead oaths. Michael: But the question re-fuses to be utterly ignored because it lies at the very heart of the a-voidance, the fear of the question, the fear of groundlessness that displays itself with/in incessant activity (called 'energy', 'positivity', 'development' and the rest and conceived as an antidote to the 'disease', the 'softness', of merely thinking {be-ing}). Jud: *Being* {*Be-ing*} *nothing* [*No-thing* are psychologic fantasies - [Precisely what Husserl was so much against] a vulgar peasant medievalism - a crude creature of the damaged imagination. There is no *mysterious question* to be feared - only the ignorance, hatred and viciousness of transcendentalists is to be feared, and one such has just been reelected to the position of the most powerful transcendentalist in the world. Michael: What is this 'power' (of the question concerning this void) that so gives rise to diversionary tactics (transcendent claims of has-to-be, eternal sub-stance, the meaninglessness of the question, etc), tactics beautifully de-signed to avoid even silently considering the question-qua-question? Such tactics themselves point to the huge potency of the danger of the question, and for that we must be eternally grateful for this gift from the avoider. Jud: There is no *void,* it is just another product of your feverish imagination. There is no *huge potency of the danger of the question.* It is the sort of naive question one expects from a child. which calls for a reassuring pat on the head, and the softly spoken words: "Don't worry son - there are no such things as ghosts or spirits or *Being* they are no more than silly old wives' tales." Regards, Jud Personal Website: _http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm_ (http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm) E-mail Discussion List: nominalism-AT-yahoogroups.com --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- This message may have contained attachments which were removed. Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005