Date: Mon Jun 19 16:55:06 1995 From: Tom Blancato <tblancato-AT-envirolink.org> Subject: Re: Sarcasm and notation Nah! The ambiguity would play on a notation enhanced writing. Malgosia Askanas writes: >But is ambiguity not an essential element of sarcasm? I have enormous >trouble with all these notational ideas, because they don't allow >ambiguity, which to me is crucial. I know one gives behavioral >signals when talking face-to-face, but behavior tends to be gloriously >ambiguous and subtle. It seems to me that these notations in fact >destroy real communication, in some sense. > >-m --- ************************************************************************ "It is only after one ceases to reduce public affairs to the business of dominion that the original data in the realm of human affairs will appear, or, rather, reappear, in their authentic diversity." -- Hannah Arendt Crises of the Republic; lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, thoughts on politics, and revolution. Hannah Arendt [1st ed.] New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich [1972] pages 142-143 Tom Blancato tblancato-AT-envirolink.org Eyes on Violence (nonviolence and human rights monitoring in Haiti) Thoughtaction Collective (reparative justice project) 521 Main Street PO Box 495 Harmony PA 16037 412-453-0211 ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005