File spoon-archives/list-proposals.archive/list-p_1995/list-p_Jun.95, message 111


Date: Mon Jun 19 16:55:06 1995
From: Tom Blancato <tblancato-AT-envirolink.org>
Subject: Re: Sarcasm and notation



Nah! The ambiguity would play on a notation enhanced writing. 



Malgosia Askanas writes:
>But is ambiguity not an essential element of sarcasm?  I have enormous
>trouble with all these notational ideas, because they don't allow 
>ambiguity, which to me is crucial.  I know one gives behavioral
>signals when talking face-to-face, but behavior tends to be gloriously
>ambiguous and subtle.  It seems to me that these notations in fact
>destroy real communication, in some sense.
>
>-m

---
************************************************************************

"It is only after one ceases to reduce public affairs to the business of 
dominion that the original data in the realm of human affairs will appear, or, 
rather, reappear, in their authentic diversity."  -- Hannah Arendt

Crises of the Republic; lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, 
thoughts on politics, and revolution. Hannah Arendt [1st ed.] New York, 
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich [1972] pages 142-143

Tom Blancato
tblancato-AT-envirolink.org
Eyes on Violence (nonviolence and human rights monitoring in Haiti)
Thoughtaction Collective (reparative justice project)
521 Main Street
PO Box 495
Harmony PA 16037
412-453-0211



     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005