File spoon-archives/lyotard.archive/lyotard_1998/lyotard.9801, message 55


Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 23:54:10 -0800
From: hugh bone <hughbone-AT-worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Random thoughts on Lyotard


Reading titles in UC Irvine archives, it seems
Lyotard has had ideas on almost everything.  
       
For years I belonged to an art group.  We discussed  postmodernism
in art classes and, eventually, I decided the term can mean most
anything.

It's not something that's "there", like Peoria or Sunset Beach, and
people come and see it, and more or less know what they mean when they
use the word.

It's an attempt, in art, to give a name to something new.  But if the
new art is in many regions, and it is, and if there are many viewers,
and there are, and if each artist has their own style, and they do,
confusion is near utter.

My point about postmodernism and art is that names like "postmodern"
are so extremely general they have little meaning.  A name like Cubism
or Dada had meaning because the works of certain artists were the
object of the definition, and  statements about those works and
those artists related to that meaning.

Something like this was occurring  not just in the art world, but also
in the worlds of literature, philosophy and other humanities.

My interest is in Le Differend which gives new insight on language,
how language rules us and is at the same time what makes us human.

Le Differend, along with other works in philosophy, psychology,
and neuroscience, convinces one that the capacities of the human
brain through language give our species the edge over others
and allow us to create the many worlds each individual inhabits.

Lyotard's work adds to understanding of this process; it is a catalyst
leading to new horizons.  There is little ambiguity in his
discussion of rights and wrongs, plaintiffs, defendants, judgments,
addressor, addressee, referent, sense, presentation, presuppositions,
authority, competence, etc.

>From another philosopher:  "I could not talk to myself had others
not talked to me." - Narrative is the method by which the child
becomes "human".  Feral children of human parents, raised by
animals, cannot acquire "human"  speech, language, or being.

Lyotard, in, "Le Differend", draws heavily on Wittgenstein, Kant, Plato,
and opens doors to "language" which were beyond my imagination,
probably W,K,P, also.

Before reading Lyotard, I was aware that Wittgenstein was credited with
the concept of the  "language game" as  the assertion that the use and
meaning of language is not something God-given, or a function of Reason,
but the discovery that the meaning of words is their use in discourse.
And, you might say, discourse creates and sustains social groups.
Even deaf mutes can use sign language.

Lyotard cites and elaborates  various Wittgenstein assertions.

Going beyond, in the manner of Deconstructionists, he speaks of phrase
genres and phrase-regimes that govern the use of different kinds of
phrases,  and describes them as if they are  entities having a "life"
of their own.

His term "phrase" means both complete thoughts, as in French
or English sentences, and  simple phrases, exclamations, etc. without
subject/predicate. Generally he means sentences, but he insists that
silence can be a phrase.

A baby cannot choose a language, and probably "reads" faces long
before he/she can link sound and meaning.  Thus children's brains,
consciousness, power of speech, are formed by phrases spoken to them
by the living, transmitted from generations of parents  and ancestors
long deceased.

By the time a  person has a college degree,  s/he has been
subjected to a couple of decades of words and
other forms of communication, and influenced by the everyday
metanarratives of folklore and religion, as well as metaphysics,
and politics..

Lyotard's use of the term "metanarrative" generally describes
what I call "ideology", but it is much broader.

Compare languages with genetic streams which fabricate, dominate,
control,living beings, human and non-human, persisting through
generations.

The mysterious practice we call language, enables a faculty
of personal expression which transcends individual mortality by
conveying visions, concepts, thoughts and dreams to
contemporaries and future generations

Genetic instructions are of course actualized only in living tissue of
the species-individual. while words persist as texts, and languages
of the arts such as paintings in caves, sculpture and architecture have
endured for thousands of years.

My understanding of metanarratives is that they are systems of thought,
like Marxism, or Christianity.  According to Lyotard and other
postmodernists some have lost faith in these stories and are
looking for something better.

People try desperately to communicate meanings. Written and spoken
words, of course, share this burden with other modes of expression,
including body language and all the languages of the arts.

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005