Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:56:47 -0700 Subject: Re: after PMC I wish had more time to respond, but I agree with Ed, a spontaneous discussion seems more in the spirit of LD. The task remains, of course, of reflecting on the rules that govern the way we link onto each other's messages... -Alan K. Smith >>>> Eric: >>>> I have been enjoying the current level of activity at this site. The >>>>posts are thoughtful and provocative. However, it also seems that there >>>>has not been that much actual discussion of TPC. > >I unilaterally began outlining TPC because it didn't seem we were >actually discussing the text here as planned. >-------------- > The guidance of your posts has really kept this project from falling >apart altogether, Eric. I'd like to think that that is all the >discussion needs though, more individual consciousness of what we're >trying to do, and a reminder from one another once in a while. > I'd like to apologize from my past and future distracting outsider >outbursts. I don't consider myself a part of the discussion really, but >an interested spectator. > A casual structure is best though, in my opinion. If I wanted to >speed or focus the process, I would try to do it with effective posts >rather than with time limits and rules. >Ed Atkeson
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005