Subject: Re: ethics - Levinas
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:46:13 +0800


G'day,

>Traditionally, and in the common sense reading of texts and
>objects which still obviously enough dominates, the concept of a 'work' is
>considered as being almost in a way related to the Newtonian conception of 
>the
>universe a 'real' singular object. By referring to a (mis)-reading I am 
>assuming
>something more relativistic and intertextual, referring to something more 
>open
>and appropriable. Is that clearer?

Yep, everything depends on one's understanding of the term and none of these 
are fixed; all are reversible.

Thanks,
Glen.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.