Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:53:34 -0700 Subject: Re: A few questions and how do you think of intimidation? Matthew Asher Levy wrote: > Yeah. I think so. I think of hate is a feeling caused by experiences, not > a theory caused by reasons. Don't get me wrong. People have theories > backing up their racism that end up being used as rationalizations for hate. > But there are plenty of racist people who feel no hatred whatsoever. They > have bought the ideas of racism and enjoy the thought that they are above > other people, but they don't particularly hate those people. They might > pity them. Often they are kind to them in a patronizing way. > > Take the relationship between prosperous Jews and not so prosperous > African-Americans in the south. Most southern Jews in the civil rights > years were still so busy trying to assimilate, busy trying to "be white," > that they bought into the racism in U.S. culture. At the same time, they > had no hard feelings or hatred towards blacks. So patronizing relationships > formed. Jewish families "took care of" their black servants' familes during > race riots, mob lynching periods, or times of police brutality. Yet, many > Jews still thought they were superior to their black servants: southern > chivalry, noblesse oblige, etc. They bought into a racist theory, but felt > no hate. You could argue that a more insidious psychological violence was > still being waged by Jews against African Americans, but it had nothing to > do with bad intentions or hate. > > Hatred is an energy that can be channeled by rationality, but I think hate > comes from something that happens to the person who hates, not from a set of > ideas. This is why no amount of reasoning can get through to someone who is > angry or hateful. I think they need to be soothed or fought, not reasoned > with. > > Consider the occassional scapegoating of Jews in 19th Century Europe. > Theories of Jewish meglomania, inferiority or filth stuck around for years > and years with nothing happening. Then there is a crises--unrelated to the > Jews--from which anger and hate is generated and a pogram is directed at the > Jews. Hate gets taken out on the Jews because of antisemetic theories, but > it "comes from" something else, for instance, economic upheaval. > > Reasoning with an angry person is like trying to pursuade a hungry hog not > to eat. Isn't there a cliche that goes something like that? It's pointless > for the person and frustrating to the pig? > > Matthew > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Sissy <sissy-AT-ix.netcom.com> > To: <lyotard-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:09 AM > Subject: Re: A few questions > > > > > > > Matthew Asher Levy wrote: > > > > > when you say "the limits of paralogy" it reveals that you are thinking > of > > > paralogy as a program.. in psychology it might make sense to talk about > the > > > limits of paralogy because it refers to a certain set of approaches. i > > > don't think of it as certain set of approaches. it is just the will to > take > > > different sorts of approaches. > > > > > > > > what are the bases on which we can rule some kinds of reasoning or > > > > > outcomes of reasoning out? on the basis of their flagrant abuse of > > > others, > > > > > of the hate they reproduce, of the terrorization of others they > imply, > > > of > > > > > the intimidation their reproduction supports? these or other bases > for > > > > > ruling some kinds of reasoning out.. or understanding that perhaps > these > > > > > are circumstances in which paralogy is not beneficial? > > > > > > Abuse, hate, terror and intimidation are not reasoning. If you see > them, > > > stop them, if you can. But don't use these horrors as an excuse to tell > > > other people how to think. > > > > Guess this can be a problem then at least if some folks think the way to > > stop them is to inquire respectfully have people elaborate and further > > explain, how you come to hate, while agonistical challenging the idea of > hate > > with other reasoning as the only way to stop hate. > > > > > > > > > > > Matthew > > > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Click here for Free Video!! > > http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005