Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 06:03:48 -0600 Subject: Re: The Sublime All, I want to deal with some of these other issues in another post, when I have a little more time. But, first of all, there is clearly a difference between interest and the ethical, certainly within both the Aristotlean and the Kantian traditions. Kant clearly distinguishes between duty and interest and says that ethics is only concerned with the former and not the latter. I realize the word duty is not a popular one today. Put in its place something like 'the right thing' or justice and what Kant says makes more sense. It is also interesting that Kant make a similar distinction between interest and beauty, but I digress... Also, there is a clear concept of the sublime that can be described in both Burke and Kant and it is something that is very different from the ineffable. My next post will deal with sublime in greater detail. I also think, contrary to Steve, that there is a Kantian side to Badiou and not merely a Hegelian paternity. More later.... eric
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005