From: "Eric" <ericandmary-AT-earthlink.net> Subject: RE: the idiot and stupidity Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 07:37:58 -0600 Steve/all Yes, "The Idiot" is certainly one reference point. It is important, I think, to remember that when Doestoevski wrote this book, he had Christ in mind. Myskin is his attempt to portray a Christlike figure in contemporary society and certainly the religious themes of redemption haunt this, as well as all his other books. Also, I have read that in Russia there is a tradition whereby the idiot is often considered to be 'touched' in the sense of being touched by the hand of God with a special charisma or grace that makes him a holy fool, and therefore is considered saintlike. Wagner's "Parsifal" also plays with similar themes. I recognize that a strong part of the theme of the idiot or holy fool is they are outsiders and therefore in a certain way not confined to the normative rules of ordinary society. The fool and wise man archetypically are alike in this respect. That said, given the current nature of contemporary society, such stances are becoming harder to maintain. You simply can't run off into the woods or the wilderness like you could in the old days. So how does one practice goodness in a corrupt society without being corrupted by it in the end? Its interesting, but yesterday I just finished reading a novel by George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying" which deals with this theme in a humorous way. Back in the thirties, poet Gordon Comstock, attempts to live without money or rank of social class and comes to find it is impossible. A sadder but a wiser man he retreats to the bane of his middle class existence. Beckett has long been a strong touchstone for me. Actually, the remarks I made about Lyotard in connection to Romanticism could also be applied to him. Keep in mind that Beckett's favorite philosopher in many respects is that arch-Romantic Schopenhauer. As far as the 'child' theme is concerned, I find his late book "Company" haunting in its dark invocation of the themes of childhood. The episode with the hedgehog especially seems to show how an attempted act of goodness, even if it does not cause actual harm, may still be inconsequential. "You take pity on a hedgehog out in the cold and put it in an old hatbox with some worms...Kneeling at your bedside you included it the hedgehog in your detailed prayer to God to bless all you loved. And tossing in your warm bed waiting for sleep you were still faintly glowing at the thought of what a fortunate hedgehog it was to have crossed your path as it did...Now the next morning not only was the glow spent but a great uneasiness had taken its place. A suspicion that all was perhaps not as it should be. That rather than do as you had perhaps better let good alone and the hedgehog pursue its way. Days if not weeks passed before you could bring yourself to return to the hutch. You have never forgotten what you found there. You are on your back in the dark and have never forgotten what you found there. The mush. The stench." eric
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005