Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:22:33 +0100 From: "steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk" <steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk> Subject: Re: How many Iraqi civilians were killed, injured Hugh The list form the 17th April - Casualties so far. Source: Reuters US - 125 killed (18 non-combat deaths); 495 injured; 3 missing UK - 30 killed; (22 non-combat deaths); 74 injured Iraqi military - about 2,320 (coalition estimate); 9,000 PoWs Iraqi civilians - 1,252 killed; 5,103 injured (Iraqi estimate); 1,402-1,817 (The Iraq Body Count organisation estimate) Journalists - 13 killed; 2 injured; 2 missing British military casualties. Source: MoD British personnel identified as dead: 30 British personnel missing in action: none British personnel identified as prisoners of war: none All this is defense of neo-conservative (american values... ) regards steve hbone wrote: > All, > > I may be naive, but I thought that since most of the 191 countries of > the United Nations, World disapproved of Iraqui Freedom, somewhere, > someone would post a list of estimated deaths and injuries Iraquis > paid for Iraqui Freedom. > > Google gives more than 200 hits. A first-level scan of a few dozen, > produced no current estimates. > > Why? > > Hugh
HTML VERSION:
US - 125 killed (18 non-combat deaths); 495 injured; 3 missing
UK - 30 killed; (22 non-combat deaths); 74 injured
Iraqi military - about 2,320 (coalition estimate); 9,000 PoWs
Iraqi civilians - 1,252
killed; 5,103 injured (Iraqi estimate); 1,402-1,817
(The Iraq Body Count organisation estimate)
Journalists - 13 killed; 2 injured; 2 missing
British military casualties. Source: MoD
British personnel identified
as dead: 30
British personnel missing in action: none
British personnel identified as prisoners of war: none
All,I may be naive, but I thought that since most of the 191 countries of the United Nations, World disapproved of Iraqui Freedom, somewhere, someone would post a list of estimated deaths and injuries Iraquis paid for Iraqui Freedom.Google gives more than 200 hits. A first-level scan of a few dozen, produced no current estimates.Why?Hugh