From: steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:24:55 -0000 (GMT) Subject: posthuman all... I read: "you are no longer human, perhaps you never were. The person standing next to you is a cyborg and the man of the year is a computer. Gender is just a memory, while futures past are here and now. Do not be alarmed you have entered the space of posthumanism...." The consenual definition of what it is to be posthuman ? I of course accept the critique and refusal of humanism's and humanities general belief in the natural supremcy of the species of humanity. I might even make a stab at understanding and even accepting the relationship between posthumanism and technology. (With some siginificant questions regarding the latter end of the equation.) But can posthumanism have a poltics that escapes the narrow confies of feminism and postcolonialism (the latter especially has been effectively questioned recently - but neither are in themselves necessarily radical in there results....) Are for example postmodernism and poststructuralism necessarily posthumanist ? Is posthumanism anti-humanist, would a non-human person accept it's position within the post-human... regards steve http://www.krokodile.co.uk
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005