Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:11:43 -0800 (PST) From: Evgeni Pavlov <evpav-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: zizek notes 1 (more questions than answers...) Steve, > Absolutely not - the main point of the text is to construct a > plauteax from which the second half of the book 'consequences' can > appear to make sense i am sorry if i'm being demanding, but it sounds as if your counterpoints are simple disagreements, that's really not what i'm looking for in this discussion - X is true! No, it isn't! is not my favorite type of argument - i have provided some textual references, you didn't, i said that zizek points out many times throughtout the book that he wants to talk about deleuze as a philosopher of the virtual and thus as dealing with the emergence of the New - you haven't provided any texts for your position. where do you think zizek states that his purpose in the book is *to construct a plateau [my spelling]*? i honestly start loosing interest in this discussion because i'm not very excited about simple exchange of feelings - you're obviously annoyed with zizek, but can you leave that aside? evgeni __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005