Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:13:38 -0800 (PST) From: Evgeni Pavlov <evpav-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: zizek notes 1 steven, my motivation for discussion is indeed my own business, my complaint was following: i attempt to support whatever i say with reasons/texts, but when i either get a brutally distorted text out of context (like yours about zizek's *negative* attitude towards virtual) or stuff like your other generalized and unsupported blurbs, i tend to save my time for other things - name dropping, generalizing and arrogance aren't my favorite strategies... --- "steve.devos" <steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk> wrote: > evgeni > > If you wish to write something to support your position please do > so, I > fail to see what I or anyone else has to do with 'your' motivation. > > regards > steve > > > Evgeni Pavlov wrote: > > >steve, > > > >that is again what i am talking about - what kind of *academic* > >response is it? - *read the book*? how about simply - *think*? do > you > >seriously expect me to take it as a discussion motivator? i did > read > >the book and now i am willing to discuss it, however, not with > that > >kind of attitude. plus my position is already unacceptable since > you > >are sure that it will prove to be unsustainable - so i should i > >bother and waste my time if you already reject my argument? > > > >evgeni > > > >--- "steve.devos" <steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > >>evgeni > >> > >>read the book. and prove your own position - it will prove to be > > >>unsustainable. because it is not actually an argument for Deleuze > >>being the > >>philosopher of the virtual. What Zizek wants to prove is that > >>deleuze > >>and of course philosophers such as lyotard are ideologues for > >>late-capitalism. > >> > >> > >>steve > >> > >>Evgeni Pavlov wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Steve, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Absolutely not - the main point of the text is to construct a > >>>>plauteax from which the second half of the book 'consequences' > >>>> > >>>> > >>can > >> > >> > >>>>appear to make sense > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>i am sorry if i'm being demanding, but it sounds as if your > >>>counterpoints are simple disagreements, that's really not what > i'm > >>>looking for in this discussion - X is true! No, it isn't! is not > >>> > >>> > >>my > >> > >> > >>>favorite type of argument - i have provided some textual > >>> > >>> > >>references, > >> > >> > >>>you didn't, i said that zizek points out many times throughtout > >>> > >>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>book that he wants to talk about deleuze as a philosopher of the > >>>virtual and thus as dealing with the emergence of the New - you > >>>haven't provided any texts for your position. where do you think > >>>zizek states that his purpose in the book is *to construct a > >>> > >>> > >>plateau > >> > >> > >>>[my spelling]*? i honestly start loosing interest in this > >>> > >>> > >>discussion > >> > >> > >>>because i'm not very excited about simple exchange of feelings - > >>>you're obviously annoyed with zizek, but can you leave that > aside? > >>> > >>> > >>>evgeni > >>> > >>>__________________________________ > >>>Do you Yahoo!? > >>>New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. > >>>http://photos.yahoo.com/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>--- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- > >>This message may have contained atta > >> > >> > > > > > >__________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. > >http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- > This message may have contained attachments which were removed. > > Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005