Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:55:00 +0000 From: "steve.devos" <steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk> Subject: Re: A -Palling Adieu to 2003 Hugh/Geoff Isn't the idea of words communicating to produce books and ideas - passing from and to brains, books, films and computers, replicating from object to object and occasionally mutating and generating a new word, thought and object not Dawkins concept of the meme ? regards steve hbone wrote: >geof, steve, > >I don't know about cats, but a TV story about the OED said "dog" came from >the Dutch "dogge" not >many centuries ago, and before that the Brits called those animals hounds. > >The OED people anticipate completing a new edition in 2037 which will have >an estimated >950,000 words. > >Someone should write a fantasy about words that communicate without human >assistance. >If genes and cells communicate to produce new humans, why not words that >communicate >to produce new books? > >regards >Hugh >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. > > > > > > >>>geof >>> >>>and then there is the question of what is their daughter called.... (and >>>her cat) >>> >>>steve >>> >>> >>Steve, >> >>On the question of daughters, cats, dogs, lions, and tigers, and bears--oh >> >> >my!-- > > >>I'm less certain. Punceptual moves, as I am given to understand them, are >>worked out of language such as it is. There may be other beings >>called "daughter" or "cat," but one's CHANCES in those encounters seem >>different to me the PROBABILITY that one could work out Paul and Carla >>daughter's name from their respective signatures. I mean, MAYBE, "Carla" >>contains "Lara," but somehow this seems sillier to me that ruminating on >> >> >how > > >>the Carla and Paul BLEY together. To BLEY with Paul"ah" seems less >> >> >abstract, > > >>even as it skips pound(stones) across the associative surface. >> >>Perhaps what I'm cautious of is not so much the daughter as that darn cat >> >> >in > > >>purr-enthesis that you have there, Steve. I mean, you mentioned this cat >>before, haven't you, with regard to various illustrations....it rather >> >> >reminds > > >>me of a case I tried to make once here about John Locke's parrot. >> >>Well, "cats," too, have heurestic value. Gregory Ulmer, a scholar out of >>Florida who is interested in notions of punceptual invention, suggests the >> >> >idea > > >>of CATTt, a mnemonic anagram developed, in part out of Breton's Manifesto >>Surrealism, that considers the im/possibilities of (C)ontrast, opposition, >>inversion, differentation, (A)nalogy, figuration, displacement, (T)heory, >>repetition, literization, (T)arget, application, purpose, and (t)ale, >> >> >secondary > > >>elaboration, representability. >> >>One could go on and on about people's various CATTt's. Descartes, for >> >> >example, > > >>according to Ulmer, utilizes C=scholasticism, A=geometry, T=theology, >> >> >T=natural > > >>science, and t=autobiography. Zizek the same. You too, perhaps. >> >>Speaking of cats, Joyce has the best depiction of a cat's meow in Chapter >> >> >II of > > >>Ulysses: "Mrkgnao!" >> >>How do animals go in everyone else's respective countries? >> >>geof >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>gvcarter-AT-purdue.edu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Actually, though, Hugh, come to think of it, perhaps Paul becomes >>>> >>>> >"Paula" > > >>>when >>> >>> >>>>he plays Carla, or rather when he Bleys, Carla. (Course, in saying as >>>> >>>> >much, > > >>>I >>> >>> >>>>note in looking through Carla's catalogue that she doesn't seem >>>> >>>> >interested > > >>>in >>> >>> >>>>becoming "Carl" in playing Paul. Interesting that she should continue >>>>to "Bley," however, one wonders about how her continuing to record with >>>> >>>> >it > > >>>>lends a counter-point to "Bley." Bad memory? Nothing doing. Paula Bley >>>> >>>> >is > > >>>the >>> >>> >>>>counter-point con-confusion of a proper name neologism. "Paula" as a >>>>heurestic, paula poundstone as mnemonic technology (i.e. one uses the >>>> >>>> >"a" as > > >>>a >>> >>> >>>>kind of "ah" stone in one's pocket. "Paula" to, ah, "Carla," perhaps.) >>>> >>>> >>>>Now, how one moves from Paula Bley to Badiou's St. Paul is a paul >>>> >>>> >together > > >>>>different matter, and I perhaps it would best to be paul-bearer of this >>>> >>>> >pun > > >>>>lest i cast any more of a paul on the proceedings... >>>> >>>>Bebopbebopbebop, >>>>geof >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Thanks, Geof, >>>>> >>>>>for correcting my bad memory. >>>>> >>>>>Hugh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Quoting hbone <hbone-AT-optonline.net>: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Geof, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I thought it was Paula Bley. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I just got a belated Xmas book, Gen. Clark's book, and will make a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>report >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>if anyone is interested. I realize he is no George Bush. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>regards, >>>>>>>Hugh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>Hugh, >>>>>> >>>>>>Well, Carla Bley, also a jazz pianist, used to be married to Paul. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>There's a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>good Steeplechase recording entitled "Paul Plays Carla" that suggests >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>that >>> >>> >>>>>>things ended w/o animosity. >>>>>> >>>>>>best, >>>>>>geof >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>--- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- >>>This message may have contained attachments which were removed. >>> >>>Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. >>> >>>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >>>multipart/alternative >>> text/plain (text body -- kept) >>> text/html >>>--- >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- This message may have contained attachments which were removed. Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005