From: "Eric" <ericandmary-AT-earthlink.net> Subject: the body of art in the age of memetic reproducibility Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 06:51:25 -0500 Steve, I was thinking about Benjamin when I asked about technology. His essay, in retrospect, was fair too optimistic about the liberating aspects of the new technology in his lifetime. Adorno's pessimism about how this would only lead to greater social controls was much more on target. It seems similar today and the question remains - is it possible to critique technology without being mindlessly utopian or mindlessly luddite. eric -----Original Message----- From: owner-lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU [mailto:owner-lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU] On Behalf Of steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:03 AM To: lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU Subject: Re: it gives me hope eric/hugh/all Ok i'll briefly clarify this. it occurred to me on reading the website that the level of bio-political, body reconstruction reminds me of the experimentations that were carried out on prisoners, and the mass radiation experiments on for example British soldiers or the deliberate infecting of soldiers with tropical diseases.. One of the significant social changes which is marked by the website is the extent to which the transhumans and other celebrities, who can be considered for this purpose an aspect of the ruling classes, are willing to allow there bodies to be sites for experimental work. The reference to cyborg/cyber-facism is not just the obvious attempt to define her/themselves as ubermensch, and everyone else as untermensch, but also because the technological discourse being engaged on here fits within what William Gibson in his short story called "The Gernsback Continuum" - a realm where the technology always works, where everything is white, the people are 'blond' and the future will always work. Both philosophically and as an enginneer I object to this incompetant and reactionary understanding which believes that technology can work perfectly, that it can escape both from its history and also from the laws of nature. That it's consequences can be improved and better humans and non-humans or even that the 'Gernsbackians' can contemplate the idea that the technology may be better and and more valuable than those who created the technology in the first place. Actually I realise only to well that the technology will never work as they imagine - anyway that's where I'm starting from... steve Eric wrote: >Steve, > >I'm with Hugh here. Can you explain in more detail what you mean here? > >I wonder if we didn't botch this whole issue in earlier discussions. >Perhaps it isn't really a matter of the cyborg as much as technology in >general. > >eric > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU >[mailto:owner-lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU] On Behalf Of >steve.devos-AT-krokodile.co.uk >Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:48 AM >To: lyotard-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU >Subject: it gives me hope > > >This renders me speechless - almost... In the 50s and 60s such >experimentation was carried out on convicts and soldiers now the >spectacle uses celebrities and idiot artists... (ah to be a cyborg in >the springtime...) > >http://www.natasha.cc/ > >or is this cyborg-fascism ? > >steve > > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005