Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 11:31:26 -0500 From: Yoshie Furuhashi <Furuhashi.1-AT-osu.edu> Subject: Re: M-FEM: Queer Kids and the...Libertarianism/Individualism Carrol wrote: >Just a footone here on the first sentence below; the part between dashes >is a crucial distinction: "work--or business--". > >Whatever the various forms of feminism might have to say on the >topic, it would seem to me that for marxists the distinction >between "work" (labor) and "business" is more important than >the concrete labor involved. The workers' movement should welcome, >even seek, the support of petty producers, and even of the >occasional capitalist (e.g., Frederick Engels), but certainly >we are far less concerned with either group than we are with >those who must sell their labor power to a capitalist in order >to survive. I agree, but with one qualification. One of the standard capitalist ploys to curtail workers' rights is to define them as "non-workers"--for instance, as "independent contractors," "freelancers." etc. So I think for us to support sex workers' movements means that a part of the struggles is likely to lie in helping them to define themselves as workers, unless they are clearly businessmen or -women. Yoshie
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005