Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 12:53:55 +0100 (MET) From: rolf.martens-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se (Rolf Martens) Subject: M-G: On the cop / psycho priest mob again Bob Malecki wrote, in one of his "Cockroach" issues, on 03.11 i.a.: (Quoting Louis "Nobleman" Proyect, who had accused him of being a provocateur:) >Louis: I have reconsidered my charge against you. I believe that Matt D. >is correct and I am not. I am convinced that you are a mental patient and >not a provocateur. Now would you do me a favor and give me the name of >your doctor. I would like Chris Burford to give him a call to see if they >can get a more powerful medication for you. Now Bob M. is a Trotsky adherent and his views thus on some main points are absolutely opposed to mine. But this "mental patient" "argumentation" against him by Louis Nobleman (it was on that M-I list) IMO seems to indicate that he's not all that wrong on *every* count. Isn't that crowd which Louis N P hangs together with, and is part of, a pretty one? Don't they "argue" in a very nice way? He even recommends the services of Mr Chris Burford. Those who are new on these lists perhaps haven't seen my posting in 5 parts, to the earlier Marxism list, on 30.06.96, "Why do I think Chris is a cop?". I recommend it to you in that case! (See Spoon archives.) Some very interesting things about Chris-B came out in connection with the "Quispe" struggle which we had in April-June. It was also the case that Bob himself supported that (now completely exposed) US imperialist agent "Quispe". That was bad enough. But Chris-B did it in a much more "sophisticated, sly and systematic" manner, using some very interesting methods, quite different from those of the openly-"arguing" Bob Malecki. And Louis Nobleman has shown his close contacts to, and close affiliation to, this person, Chris-B, before too. Now on the M-I, there seems to be a "rule" that you're *not* allowed to say or agrue that certain other writers are cops(!). Perhaps precisely because of that 30.06.96 posting of mine, I'd guess. Isn't that an interesting rule? Of course there most likely would be quite a lot of cops on lists like these. Now here I'd like to warn other readers and writers that there *seems* to be a whole coterie of some - at least - quite suspicious people involved (as is Louis Noble and some of his friends) in the running of these entire Spoon lists. Not that this can hurt you very much, and the lists may function quite well as debating media anyway. But when you get to see some of the "arguments" which these people will bring forward in the future, you should bear in mind, I hold, the possibility that they are some really *professional* crooks indeed. That "insanity" gambit since long has a particular name. It's called the "Andropov syndrome", after the onetime biggest boss of the KGB in the social-imperialist Soviet Union. Once again: Isn't that a very nice gambit? If you should ever get it used against you - then that IMO should be taken as a certain indication that you've hit on something correct that is somehow quite uncomfortable to the reactionaries. The reactionaries are in deep shit today, that's what's causing their wild and nervous actions. Rolf M. --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005