Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 15:34:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: M-G: Rolf lets slip both a foolish AND ill-advised remark



Dear Louis:


On Sat, 4 Jan 1997, Louis R Godena wrote:

>
> Rolf replies to Zeynep:
>
> >...So I can understand that you didn't like too much some things
> >I wrote about the list.    Anyway they weren't all directed in the main
> >at you,  although it is a fact that an excessive naivete' and/or lack of
> >experience of anti-imperialist struggles, which it seems to me are qualities
> >that you have,  may be of some use to cops.
>
> I don't like your answer,  Rolf.
>
> But I'm going to give you an opportunity to revise it.
>
>        
> Louis Godena


This is what you said Rolf wrote above. Here is the part of that message
that Rolf actually sent to the list.

________________________________________________________________________
From=20rolf.martens-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se Sat Jan  4 15:25:03 1997
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 16:27:10 +0100 (MET)
From: Rolf Martens <rolf.martens-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se>
Reply-To: marxism-general-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
To: marxism-general-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: M-G: Klasberries get US/"Nobleman" boot threat on M-I

<snip>

So I can understand that you didn't like too much some things I
wrote about that list. Anyway, they weren't at all directed in
the main at you, although it's a fact that an excessive naivité and/or
a great lack of experience of anti-subversion struggles, which it
seems to me are qualities that you have, may be of some aid to cops.

Rolf M.

________________________________________________________________________

Rolf  used the word "anti-subversion" (at least in the message that I
received from M-G). However, in your quote of Rolf's message, the
word "anti-imperialist" appears instead.

Could you please explain this anamoly? I am really confused.

Sid






     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---