Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 09:54:04 +0100 From: m-14970-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se (Hugh Rodwell) Subject: M-G: Re: Labour Theory of Value ( AA's abstract indeterminacy) Andrew A writes: >I am not going to argue with somebody who does not even understand feudal >relations. How about explaining the poor fool's errors to improve the understanding of more enlightened subscribers? Or does Andrew assume that everybody else understands everything perfectly already? I mentioned serfs and seigneurs and the fact that the exploitation of the former by the latter didn't take place at the point of exchange. Perhaps Andrew is thinking about some special kind of *capitalist* feudal relations? Anyhow, I'd be interested in seeing where Marx shows that feudal exploitation takes place at the point of exchange -- or doesn't involve serfs and seigneurs. >It is bad enough that you don't understand basic ABCs of Marxism. Get down off your cloud, stop posing, and explain with examples. This wouldn't be argument, but enlightenment, patient explanation, developing the understanding of Marx on a Marxism discussion list. >I am delighted to leave to the judgment of the list you understanding of >Marxism. I wouldn't be if I was in your shoes. Cheers, Hugh --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005