Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 12:20:26 +0000 Subject: M-G: Re: M-I: Reply to Dave Bedggood Mark, I too value my time in these debates. Thats why I think it necessary to be clear. You cannot justify the politics of the Stalinist bureaucracy in the name of history. To say that some `iron law' made stalinism necessary is to hide behind an abstraction. Its a false abstraction because we all know that Stalinism was the concrete result of concrete class struggles, not the least important the menshevik/social democratic betrayal of the German revolution. If Lenin died of syphilis at least he was the part-author of his own demise, unlike Trotsky. There is absolutely no need to justify any aspect of Stalinism when it is clear that stalinism always detracted >from the gains of October. If the bureaucrats defended workers propety this was because they lived off it, not because they saw it as superior to capitalism. Obviuosly for them it ceased to be superior to capitalism which is why the bureaucracy ultimately had to restore capitalism. Why did stalinism last so long, and why did it collapse when it did? Well not because of some ahistorical iron law which originates in a Kantian mind-set, but because workers property, despite all the shit the imperialists threw at it, survived for so long. It collapsed when it did, starved of worker support internatiionally, and exhaused through loss of blood sucked out of it by the parasitic bureauracy. So we come back to the point that Stalinism was an historic excrescence on the backs of workers holding them back, betraying their struggles from 1923 onwards, the ultimate betrayal being the restoration of capitalism after 1989. To say that Stalinism was anything but counter-revolutionary is to sow illusions in the past struggles and for the future. It is consistent with the menshevik marxism of many on this list, who if they don't think that October was a mistake, consign history to a series of stages in which the working class comes under the tutelage of the enlightened petty bourgoeis intelligentsia. In this schema, stalinism is was a necessary evil. That's not good enough. The working class will make no headway until it settles accounts with Stalinism. I'll read you stuff on the Red Army if you read Malecki's latest Cockroach (39) in particular his reply to a 'Russian Communist". Dave. --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005