Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 09:49:30 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: M-G: Unprincipled actions of the moderators of M-I


Jerry,

The information of yours below IMO does prove your point.
I didn't know these things. We disagree - rather sharply too -
on another matter, but thank you for this.

Snitch it is.

Rolf M.


>Rolf Martens wrote:
>
>> I'm not that certain Louis Nobleman P. should justly be called
>> a "snitch". Pretty reactionary he IMO is though.
>
>Members of m-th, m-int, or PEN-l can delete now. Repetition, for the
>benefit of m-g only members follows:
>
>Short version:
>
>a) LNP threatens to contact Hans Ehrbar's employer at Utah to get him
>fired. Why? LNP doesn't like or politically agree with Hans.
>
>b) LNP threatens to contact the British psychologists association to get
>Chris B decertified. Why? LNP doesn't like or politically agree with Chris
>B. [The stated reason in all 3 cases is to chase the people he dislikes
>off of m-int].
>
>c) LNP not only threatens to get me fired. He contacts a member of
>MANAGEMENT at a place where I work [a CAPITALIST institution] to try to
>get me, a TRADE UNION member, disciplined and/or fired. Why? He doesn't
>like me (slight understatement). In fact, he justified the above on
>Saturday by saying that I was the "scumbag of the century."
>
>Now, what do you call it when someone crosses class lines to get a
>political opponent fired? I'd call it being a "snitch."
>
>Jerry
>
>
>
>     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>



     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---