File spoon-archives/marxism-general.archive/marxism-general_1997/97-03-11.171, message 39


Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:01:02 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: M-G: Aldofo, Detcom and Joe Stalin!


Bob wrote, on 06.03:

(and now I just pick out the *most* stupid things...)

>But I guess the hairs on Aldolfo neck are upraised in 
>furious jealousy because the MRTA pulled off this spectacular embassy 
>occupation and not the PCP. 

>What great "exposes" of the real situation. And on this list????The only 
>thing Aldolfo and his weasely little partner Detcom has been doing lately on 
>any list is threatening to murder their political opponents and whining 
>about everybody who doesn't support emperor Aldolfo's line are agents of 
>good old Fujimora himself.

...............

>And Rolf's backhanded support means that he is 
>supporting the same politics as the old KPML-R had here in Sweden. 

(It so happens Bob is close to that creep group here, which *I* in
1974 managed to turn into a political corpse by showing its true
connection to Bob's friend Soviet social-imperialism....This just
for you people who don't know that much about Swedish internal
affairs.)

>And your little lapdog Detcom as the star photographer! Sniffing around in 
>dogshit and threatening to publish pictures of his political opponents for 
>the real cops. Not to mention the great success of the now dead? Aldolfo 
>construction of the WMC (World Mobilization Committee). Awfully quiet about 
>that WMC Aldolfo. I guess your idea of a mini "red front" around every word 
>that Gonzalo ever uttered connected to the full program of the PCP, (that 
>program these days being very unclear) has not been a great success. 
>Otherwise we would be hearing you and your little sniffer from Detroit 
>howling at the moon and Rolf whining about being run over by Aldolfo.

Sometimes (not often) I've come across postings which tempt me
into proposing some law against "stupidity beyond the bounds of
necessity". This is one of them. OK, OK, I *know* that such a law
would probably be no good. But couldn't some sort of regulation or
something be made anyway forbidding people to write articles ten 
times stupider that are really their authors? What do the legal 
experts say?

Rolf M.




     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005