Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 00:29:52 -0500 Subject: M-G: Dave and the state caps... Daves Comments in the latest round with the state caps which was sparked by Hugh's letter yesterday i think says something extremely important when it all comes down to the cookie jar. And that is all of this discussion about some rather small details of late must be seen in relation to what the "state capitalist" trend has done in regards to the SU in their history. There top down empiric view of history instead of a revolutionary Marxist analisis of the SU based on classes has led them historically into some pretty sleezy *concrete* political actions time and again. Usually of siding with imperialism against the former defrormed and degenerated workers states or having a line of a plague on both your houses of abstentionism. This is the bottom line of the whole debate! Not just what you say--but what you do. Another interesting twist which I hope Dave develops a little more is what this type of thinking has done to many of those groups claiming to be Trotskyist! The Pabloites of yesterday and today for example or the recent turn of the SWP towards Cuba! I think that once one starts down the road of liquidating or questioning the ABc's of what Trotsky and the left opposition built the FI on one can wind up just about anywhere on the spectrum. But as I believe in the materialist view of history this means that it is other social forces and political forces then the proletariat which is what many of these fake Trotskyists in the final analisis capitulate too. We can say for example one of the reasons that Social Democracy is and has deserted the working class is partially because the class character of these parties has definitely changed from being parties based on the trade unions and labor aristocracy to a cadre of Socialist Traitors who's material reality and schooling is completely petty bougeois and middle class. If this is the case for the Social Democracies, parties of a mass character. Then why can't this lead to all kinds of political deviations in the "Trotskyist envionment" which historically was isolated from the class as a whole! The only difference being that the sons and daughters of the old labor aristocracy are now hardly that any longer but mostly middle class creeps and bureaucrats who have grown up on administrating the gains that came because of the October revolution... By the way this does not change the basics. The all powerful "middle class" is based on a pretty exceptional period of history which now has ended. The post war economic boom which came at the expense of millions upon millions of skulls of poor and working class people and created the situation no longer exists... By the way the only thing that can change this is that a sizeable part of the proletariat either in one country or in a number of countries are won to the banner of orthodox trotskyism which can turn the scales in the other direction. The Stalinist pipedream of resurrecting Stalin or at least his politics just won't do it. Nor will the state capitalist line because its fundemental flaw is empirism. Thus they instead of vying for leadership of the class internationally will unfortunately be sideline commentators with either right wing pro imperialist tactics or ultra left sectarian out in the desert tactics like Neils group.. Warm regards Bob Malecki --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005