Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 17:58:06 +0200 Subject: M-G: Re: M-I: Nationalism (Fwd from moderator) At 16:20 1997-04-08 +0300, you wrote: Zeynep wrote; >Someone summed up what happened for two centuries in a few paragraphs, >concluding with; > >>>This sums up the revolutionary heritage of Marxism, Bolshevism and >>>Trotskyism on this question today. It enables us to explain why in >>>times of crisis, nationalism comes to the fore, as rival national or >>>ethnic leaders compete for influence over terrritory which they can >>>offer to imperialism as its local agents. > >With half a paragraph about what's happening today. I won't reproduce the >whole post to spare the agony. > >That's exactly what I was referring to when I said "in this cyberseminar if >we get big abstractions, we'll have nothing". Is political clarity on such and important question which has caused so much blood to be shed "nothing"? > >I find this attitude incredibly stupid and unfruitful. Say we have a >complicated problem like the rise of political islam and its attraction to >many working class people and the urban poor in various islamic capitalist >nations? "Religion is the opium of the masses". What else do we need to know >anyway. Well, if you want to have a discussion on the if and why's of this I think it would be fine. we could start for example with the Iranian "revolution" and the role it played in this religious revival and Islam. Not to mention the key role that the Iranian left played in the victory of the Islamic fundementalists. In that perhaps lies the key to finding clarity. It could have gone the other way you know if the Tudah party and various "maoist" influenced organisations had not taken the political path that they did. We could have had and Iranian October and then perhaps we would not be talking about ythe revival of Islamic fundementalism. > >The author says: > >>The result is the emergence of imperialist proxy wars in which whole >>populations are mobilised by appeals to nationalism [Croat vs >>Serb], ethnicity [Tutsi and Hutu], religion [Hamas vs Zionism] behind >>the formation of bourgeois mini-states offering themselves up for >>super-exploitation.. > >Right. That explains the whole phenomenon. No need to worry about the >details. The Hamas kids throwing rocks at Isreali APCs and getting shot want >to offer a bourgeois mini-state to imperialism, HADEP women marching with >the colors of the Kurdish flag are also in the line to offer a bourgeois >mini-state to imperialism. > >I remember something about the Marxist method. You're supposed to start from >the concrete, before abstracting. This kind of stuff looks more like >abstract -> abstract -> abstract -> abstract (boring -> boring -> boring). > Zeynep, the above is very touching, (especially about the Hama kids throwing stones! Well, I have thrown my fare share of stones and in fact fire bombs. But it does not change the fundementals of trying to forge a political leadership that not only have the correct political line but can allso deliver the revolutionary practice! Whether it be in the form of a small propaganda group, a national party in a specific country or a International with pretentions of leading struggles in many countries. For example the above paragraph which is quite politically correct but makes you sick because you are thinking about the little kids throwing rocks or the Kurdish Women marching under a certain flag. The point is translating the political correct position both into propaganda that can be understood by the masses and lead to action which moves the struggle forward. Thus with the little kids throwing stones and their fundemental wrong idea of the jews being the enemy must be combatted with a line of "not Arab against jew, but class against class!" so that the jewish and Arab kids start throwing the stones in the right direction. Now Lenin I am sure was pretty aware that the trenches in World War One for example were certainly a far more dangerous place to be in then let say the west bank at present. And I am quite sure he understood the horror of it all. But it did not stop him from taking on the then dominant line of the Second International and struggling for political clarity! His line was Turn the Imperialist war into a class war and he certainly did not have a great following to go hopping out in those trenches to tell people about it. The truth is that history has show that there are people throwing stones (and much worse) all the time just as women have marched under all kinds of flags. But the point is in which direction are they throwing the stones and what color are the flags and banners marching under. This anti-theory outburst is unfortunately not going to help those little Hama kids or Kurdish Women one bit! Or do you think that Lenin for example was doing a bunch of empty sloganeering when he raised the slogan "Turn the imperialist war into Proletarian Revolutions!"? I am quite sure that you think that Dave's excellent article on the basics of the National question are quite boring when you feel your whole body itching to get out their and march with those Kurdish women. But the point is that in order to march I hope that we have a theory which can back up all this activity in heading towards the goals that we set and not just activism that leads to new blood baths and new rounds of defeats under new flags. That is why Marx made the correct assumption that the working man/women have no country and the only thing that they have to lose is their chains... Warm regards Bob Malecki ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check Out My HomePage where you can, Read the book! Ha Ha Ha McNamara, Vietnam-My Bellybutton is my Crystalball! Or Get The Latest Issue of, COCKROACH, a zine for poor and working-class people and now starting the "Never Ending Story"... http://www.algonet.se/~malecki Back issues of Cockroach and my book at http://www.kmf.org/malecki/ -------------------------------------------------------- --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005