Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 22:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Burleson <anvil-AT-sunspot.tiac.net>
Subject: Re: M-G: Re: greetings



Comrades, we are all incorrect, and Rolf is correct, according to
this.... Enjoy.  (!?)


On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Rolf Martens wrote:

> No! Certain qualifications are needed. One must have seen
> through things at least approximately - today understand
> the basic correctness of Marxism, Leninism and Mao Zedong
> Thought (they're one unity today) and have a line that
> really, approximately at least, *favours' the vast majority
> of people. Sometimes it's difficult to say, who should
> really be considered a Marxist and who should not. Everybody
> is making mistakes, for instance. But one who - such as you -
> havent't seen through the charcter that the Soviet Union had,
> from at least the early 60s on - I would say does not qualify
> as a Marxist. The facts of that case are so clear. The question
> too (still) is so important.
> 
> >Your idea that the ruling class is pretending to
> >be wolves in sheep's clothing is totally paranoid. 
> 
> Another reason, Bruce, why I wouldn't call you a Marxist.


Am I alone, oh halleluia, when I fall on my knees, halleluia,
and worship the image of Mao, oh, praise the lord!  None of us
are worthy, halllllllll-elujiah,  except the great prophet:

ROLF!


We all must worship him, because he posesses the soul of Mao and is
the single arbiter of truth.

Worship, worship, worship.  


I think I've made my point...

Bruce Burleson




     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---