Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 22:58:46 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: M-G: Persson's pet Malackey attacks the workers again


Persson's pet Malackey attacks the workers again
[Posted: 07.09.97]

With a third posting, this time today, the phony"Marxist" Robert
Malecki, of Robertsfors, Sweden, openly states his wish that
his masters the ultra-reactionaries in Sweden and in the world
as a whole should try to bomb this country back to the stone age,
in a similar way to what they earlier tried to do in Vietnam and
in Afghanistan.

He openly shows his great hate for all opposition to such
bombing activities.

What should the workers care if the sabotage plans against the
Barseb=E4ck nuclear power plant are carried through or not, he
says again. That's "just one lousy atomic power pland", don't you
see. What if it produces 6% of all electricity in Sweden? What if
its destruction would cost the masses here $5-7bn? What if such
wanton destruction inevitably would mean that some thousands more
people became unemployed? "Nothing to be concerned about".

I pointed out in my posting on this and in my replies to the
reactionary Malackay's earlier rantings that the present attack
on Barseb=E4ck and the entire international "green" warfare by the
ultra-reactionaries against the peoples of the world show that
ALL the ruling mafias, in Sweden and in the world as a whole,
must be kicked out of power by the peoples of all countries.

That writer doesn't like this at all. He sees "his" particular
mafias, those which he's a Malackay of, coming under attack.

Bob Malackay represents the interests of such forces internatio-
nally as the Russian new tsarists and the Al Gore group in the
USA, and the Greenie Persson clique here in Sweden. Isn't he
a "great revolutionary" "helping the masses" by supporting such
sabotage activities against industry here? What better friend
could Greenie Persson wish for in his conspiratorical activi-
ties? No wonder that some of the reactionary mass media in this
country are taking this Malackey to their bosoms, letting him
regularly put out some hypocritical radio slime etc.

A few quotes from his posting 3 and some brief comments - and
btw, it seems he's only posted his No. 3 to the M-G mailing
list and not to 'swnet.politik' (etc) this time, so I shall
forward it to that newsgroup at least:

>Rolf "Martian" M=E5rtens is on his knees begging Carl Bildts
>conservative party of Sweden to save the aging Maoist deadheads
>like himself and the working class from some sort of imperialist
>conspiracy

As all can see, I called on the *masses* to act. I pointed out
how Bildt precisely *supported* the conspiracy by being silent
on it on 28.08. Bob M. again says there's "no" such conspiracy
at all. But everybody can see there *is*, a rather big one too.

>Clinton and his pals are arming the Islamic fundementals to the
>teeth for a new blood bath...

So Malackey the "green" warrior against the workers is "not"
precisely one of Clinton's very close pals? That's funny.

My and other people's resistance to the present sabotage plans
he calls:

>their desperation to find a single issue to support and trick
>people into believing in their ideas of progressive and reac-
>tionary imperialist countries.

So there are "no" sabotage plans at all, huh? I and others have
to run around trying to "find" them?

And the correct assessment, made by the Marxists since many de-
cades back, that the small and medium European countries - some
of which, such as Sweden, undoubtedly *are* imperialist coun-
tries too - are in an *intermidate* position in the world, that's
"not" correct, what?

This is precisely what the *biggest* reactionaries in the world,
the US imperialists and the Russian new tsarists, would have
people believe. The attacks on various industries in Europe are
being instigated not least by them. To a certain extent, they
have to do with superpower hegemonism. Most of all of course
they're part of a warfare against the working-class.

Again he attacks the defence of Barseb=E4ck:

> their reactionary petty bougeois nationalist tune around one
>"lousy" atomic power plant

Defending that plant is *not* "nationalist". It's in the vital
interests of the workers, not only in Sweden itself. If some
petty bourgeois forces want to support that defence, that's
good and not bad. Such support is *not* reactionary. The Ma-
lakcey's support of Greenie's and his friends' sabotage plans,
which are instigated internationally by the Al Gore people,
among others, *that's* ultrareactionary, that's the act of an
asshole arch-enemy of the working people.

Malackay quotes me:

(Rolf M:)
> "... it" (that *silence* now on the part of the leader of a
> bourgeois party that in the past had seemed at least in part to
> *oppose* the "green" warfare by the main reactionaries) "must
> make clear to the great majority of people that IT'S THEY
> THEMSELVES WHO MUST INTERVENE. Quite directly now in order to
> SAVE BARSEB=C4CK. And also CONCERNING THE VITAL QUESTIONS OF
> SOCIETY IN GENERAL."

And conludes:

>Here Rolf "Martian" Martens is begging the conservatives to
>intervene and save us in capital letters.

Can this person even read? Perhaps he should rather change his
name to "Upsidedownovich".

Supposedly, Malacky in his younger days *combated* the US impe-
rialist aggression against Vietnam. But now he gets so steamed-
up that he betrays his really pro-US-imperialist stanpoint on
this question too and writes:

>Naturally it is only a straight step to the right since the
>Vietnam days where the Maoists would have blocked with the pope
>or anybody else in order to build a broad anti-American
>movement.

Precisely a *broad* anti-US-imperialist movement (and precisely
*not* an "anti-American" one, as the openly-right-wing forces
of that time were calling it and as their Malackay now *openly*
parrots them too, by repeating), comprising also bourgeois for-
ces and, yes, why not the Pope himself is he in some way had been
*against* the US imperialist aggression, that was the correct
and necessary thing to work for.

That supposed "anti-Vietnam-war activist" Malackey now *openly*
opposes even this, just to try to defend his *recent* pro-US-
imperialist activities!

And there's much more garbage in this latest posting of his,
but it would just bore everybody including myself to go into this
stuff any further. What can be seen above is quite enough, I
think.

Being anti-Malackey is *not* being "anti-American", I'd like to
stress too, and even after his repeating the *Goldwater*
stoneage-rightwing stuff against "anti-American"(!) campaigns in
connection with the Vietnam war, I shall not say "Yankee go
home!" either; since I hold that even reactionaries and their
asshole lackeys should have the right to live wherever they
please, including in such countries whose industries they'd like
to see razed to the ground.

And yes, one more thing: Precisely *I* have always *attacked*
the revisionist regime in China by the Deng Xiaoping etc clique,
which by no means is a "Maoist" regime but a *fascist* one, and
the Malackey (or Upsidedownovich), among others, it has been
who's *defended* that regime as "socialist"[!] etc. He now tried
to turn matters upside-down on this too, in his posting 3.

Rolf M.



     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---