Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 08:57:52 +0000
Subject: Re: M-G: LCMRCI reply to Spartattack


> Date:          Fri, 12 Sep 1997 02:06:38 -0400
> To:            marxism-general-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
> From:          malecki-AT-algonet.se (Robert Malecki)
> Subject:       M-G: LCMRCI reply to Spartattack
> Reply-to:      marxism-general-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

Bob,
New you would appreciate it.  We have an official reply coming 
sometime directed at the horses mouth.
I'm not on the Trotsky Project, so I am unaware of any bans. We have 
allowed an early document which originates our differences with the ICL 
to be put on that list.  So if  ICL or its supporters such as 
yourself are denied a reply we would obviously have to challenge that 
decision.  I will post that article to you in case you don't have it. 
Dave.

> Dave writes;
> 
> "ere an article reprinted 
> from Class Struggle, newspaper of the Communist Workers Group in New 
> Zealand, which is reponding to an earlier debate with Robert on this 
> list over mainly critical support for New Labour. But it also goes 
> into more detail about our fundamental methodological differences 
> with the Spartacists that go back to the early 1970's. 
>  Dave."
> 
> Gee Dave,
> I am impressed. If I remember you wanted to talk to the horse and not the 
> horses ass or something. In light of that I find it quite extrodinary that 
> the New Zealand group ferlt it neccessary to publish a reply in their 
> newspaper.  Naturally it is even the duty of centrists to try and straigten 
> out the ranks on your capitulation to the "New Social Democracy" of Tony 
> Blair. Anthow here is a reprint of the stuff on the Lcmcri and their 
> election "tactics"..By the way are you involved in the fake "Trotsky" Faq in 
> any way and supporting the bans against the ICL people?
> 
> Warm regards
> Bob Malecki
> 
>> 

Dave Bedggood


     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---