Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:47:45 +0200 (MET DST)
From: rolf.martens-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se (Rolf Martens)
Subject: M-G: Radioslime China - laying it on thick


On 04.10, the indefatigable lackey of reaction in general
and US imperialism in particular, Bob Malecki, wrote:


>This is the first draft report for Straightfacts radion 
>on China.

>Good Evening, this is Bob Malecki reporting
>for Straight Facts somewhere in northern Scandinavia
>quite near the Polar Circle!

>China on the brink of capitalist counter-revolution.[!!]

So why is China now "only on the *brink of* counter-
revolution", according to this person, when in reality,
as all have been able to see, the counter-revolutionaries
have been in total control there for upwards of 20 years?

The Malackey is trying to cover up his and his friends'
systematic *support* of the counter-revolution in China,
a country that they all the time until now have depicted 
as "socialist, only with deformations". 

He reports about present peasant uprisings. That's not
bad as information. But what does he have to say about
the fascist suppression of the mass movement in China in
June, 1988? What does he have to say about the systematic
and massive tearing down, in the 1980s, of the People's
Communes in China, on which the entire socialist system
there was built and which were the entities that ensured
that great success in agriculture which there were in Mao
Zedong's time and whose abandonment have led to that 
enormous catastrophe that, since 1985 on, China by far
doesn't produce enough foodstuffs for its population? 

During the Cultural Revolution, agricultural production 
in China increased by 4% a year, considerably slower than
industrial production, whose annual increase according to
the US paper IHT (autumn 1976) was 10% during that time,
but constituting a considerable success all the same, step
by step raising the standard of living for the common people,
since it clearly exceeded the annual population growth which
was then some 2%.

The above-mentioned things, and many others, are "not" clear
evidence of a capitalist restoration having taken place
long ago in China??

"No", says this long-time supporter of the Deng fascist
clique in that country! He even has the gall to say that 
*he* was the one who supported the people's interest in
China, while those who condemned that fascist rule and
supported the resistance against it "were the ones who
betrayed the Chinese people"!

How much of a reactionary swine can one person become?
How far can up he get his tongue into the asshole of the
worst reactionaries in the world? Perhaps the limit hasn't
been seen yet?

The Malackey writes:

>For the now dead western "Maoists" groups who these days are
>organizing demonstrations with liberal and right wing groups
>under the cover of "human rights"around the world connected 
>to at best trying to say that China is already capitalist and 
>even "fascist" as they once did the Soviet Union have deserted
>the Chinese workers and peasants who show that they are not
>as willing to hand over the Chinese revolution to the class
>enemy as these once "oh so radical" westrn Maoists now do
>in both word and action. They in fact are the agents of despair
>and are backhandely supporting the call for the destruction
>of the deformed Chinese workers state!

Yes, please take alook at this *open defence* of the present-day
bourgeois, fascist dictatorship in China! Behind his phony
"radical" phrases, the Malackey agitates *against* the revolu-
tionary overthrow of the Chinese revisionists.

And then of course he says *the very opposite* too  - as I've
already pointed out, that's a very "convenient" way for some
reactionariy phonies to deal with things, "having it both
ways": 

>Unlike these fake leftist cretins who now have deserted the
>Chinese Workers and Peasants; [!!]

>The history of Chinese Bolshevism will be found in the works
>of the Chinese trotskyists like P'eng Shu-tse and others.For
>our radio public I suggest the book "The Chinese Communist
>Party in Power" by P'eng Shu-tse.

>What is lacking in China is a Bolshevik/Leninist party which
>can lead these rebelling Chinese masses in a political revolution
>to oust these Stalinist traitors and turn China into a beacon
>of proletarian Internationalism and hope for our common future.

What? "Political revolution"? "Ousting the traitors"? - Whom
until now he's so fanatically *supported* and *protected*?

That "political revolution", what would it do, then, to the
present Chinese state, the fascist dictatorship of the 
bourgeoisie? Above, the same Malackey *attacked* those who
wanted it to be destroyed. Obviously, his talk about "poli-
tical revolution" is mere verbiage intended if possible too
fool some small children - he wants the fascist state to stay!

Rolf M




     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---