From: mim3-AT-mim.org Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 22:48:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: M-G: Re: Communism vs. Socialism [Original comment] I'm new to this list, have only recently discovered Marxism (I'm self-educating as best I can) and have an observation of Marxist internet links and a question I'd like to hear some discussion of: In 4 months of spending lunch-hours and after-hours eagerly searching the internet for Marxist essays, propoganda, and organizations, I'm still perplexed that there's only one organization I could find (the Progressive Labor Party) believes in "fighting directly for communism"! Why are all the other revolutionary movements promoting socialism? To me, the PLP's view makes sense - that socialism naturally leads to capitalism (maybe even "perfects" capitalism so that it appears to be the best way to go? - that my suspicion). Anyway, I'm surprised that no other communist organizations have that view. I know that many socialists believe that moving directly to communism would be too drastic, and I can understand that some peope would feel that way. However, we're talking about people and organizations that believe that the world is otherwise capable of adapting to enormous fundamental changes that a successful revolution would implement - why do such people and organizations see real communism as too revolutionary? Wouldn't the difficulties of instituting Marxist socialism be every bit as daunting as creating a communist government? Etc. Thanks to anyone who gives me feedback! MIM3 replies: How refreshing to read something from someone open about their studies. There are other organizations fighting directly for communism as you say. They are anarchists. However, I will agree with Rolf at least that communism involves no state. I believe if you ask them, the PLP will say it is for a dictatorship of the proletariat as a state, but it really only wants communism in economic policy. If they say no that's not accurate, come back and I'll prove it from their writings. They want war communism like in the early period of the Bolshevik Revolution. You have opened a very important question and I hope that you will follow it through to the end --including PLP's views. The real problem with PLP's views is that they lack materialist method. Formulating strategy and principles for struggle is not just a matter of coming up with the nicest list of poetry. I wish I could fly in space unaided by mechanical devices. I really do. That does not mean others who are studying rocket science are not serious about getting into space while I am. That's the difference between materialist science and moralizing idealism. Studying and work through the details of rocket science will be much quicker to get someone into space than my wish to get there. Now PLP says socialism leads to capitalism. How stupid! Then we can say that primitive communism leads to slavery! Oh sure, the PLP publishes articles about primitive communism, but do they print them to make a religion out of communism or to actually get to communism? Alternatively we can say that PLP's idea of communism leads to capitalism--because where has PLP's stuff led to communism? In practice, their ideas are part of the status quo. You need to decide for yourself if liberation of nations is a step forward. PLP says no. Then what about eradicating "to each according to his coupons (deeds, stocks etc)"--is that progress or not? Who achieved this progress in history? Not the PLP or its line anywhere. Sure it was set back in China, but does that excuse PLPism for never getting that far? You need a concrete yardstick. It's not a matter of formulating the highest sounding principles. History is full of people that made all high and mighty pronouncements who never contributed anything to a successful struggle. One last thing--MIM is actually the contemporary successor to the original PLP, ideologically. The PLP started out as a Maoist party and then decided to careen into idealist oblivion. More on that if you are interested later. --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005