Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 14:56:28 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Beasley-Murray <jpb8-AT-acpub.duke.edu> Subject: Re: M-I:*The* Unconscious; was Marxists on desire Well, Carrol and I may have to agree to disagree on this, as he seems quite set in his refusal of the concept of the unconscious, and I (as he noted) am quite set in my acceptance that there is such a thing as the unconscious (if willing to grant a wide variety of views on what it is and how it works). [Maybe this might be a topic to cross-post to marxism-psych, or at least to sound out the thoughts of folk over there, by the way.] To state my position (and not to appear "illicit"), I think that reference to the unconscious is reference to the fact that we are not purely rational beings (for better or for worse) and that some (at least) of what we do is determined by forces beyond our control that are *also* to some extent at least an integral part of us (ie. are not merely external contstraints). I think Freud is persuasive (and a very easy read, by the way) in his demonstrations of the impact of the unconscious--primarily, for him, visible in dreams, jokes and "slips." "The ego is not master in his own house." Fair enough, I say. I do, however, tend to part company with much of psychoanalysis from thereon, and especially find much recent psychoanalytic theory dry and disabling. Anyhow, all this just to explicate the "of course" to which Carroll took exception. I think Marxist theories (indeed any liberatory praxis) have to take account of the unconscious (and thus desire) even if their aim is to subdue it. I think Justin well exemplifies the position that the socialist project is to produce a rational management and understanding of the world, and that this necessarily involves a subjugation of the unconscious--"Where Id was, there Ego shall be." I happen to be less comfortable with this position (and would question its viability, for a start), which is also the project of ego-psychology, and yet don't want to fall into the various Lacanian mystifications that are also premised upon a rejection of such ego-psychology. Anyway, hope all this clarifies where I'm coming from, at least. Take care Jon Jon Beasley-Murray Literature Program Duke University jpb8-AT-acpub.duke.edu http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~spoons --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005