Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 19:54:56 -0500 (EST) From: Siddharth Chatterjee <siddhart-AT-mailbox.syr.edu> Subject: Re: M-I: Soft on Stalinism? On Mon, 18 Nov 1996, Carrol Cox wrote: > "Stalinist" is a label which we should stop applying to others, period, > and when anyone applies it to him/herself, we should ignore the label and > examine the concrete theories and practices which it seems, in each case, > to be a *mere* name (puff of air in the radical nominalist sense). > It is curious but the word "Stalinist" is hurled with equal ferocity by the right wing,Trotskyists, and 'left' intellectuals (e.g., Christopher Hitchens) alike. This word is used to conjure up images of monstrousnes similar to the word "communist" and "anti-semitic". Propaganda words like these have been widely used in the past by the bourgeoise and the media (e.g., describing the Sandinista govt. as 'Marxist-Leninist', Bolsheviks 'eating babies', 'authoritarian-totalitarian' regimes) to denigrate the enemy of the moment and score public relations points. One is supposed to cringe and try to hide when such words are used by one's opponent. Since we are on the subject, here is a final parting shot. Mahatma Gandhi, apparently, was once asked what he thought of Western Civilization. After some deliberation, Gandhi replied that "it would be a good idea". Similarly, Noam Chomsky began one of his seminars on Free Market Democracy by saying that "it would be a good idea". To complete the Holy Trinity, "Maleckian Trotskyism (and other current versions)..... would be a good idea". --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005