Date: 21 Jan 97 09:52:25 EST From: jonathan flanders <72763.2240-AT-CompuServe.COM> Subject: M-I: Rail Strike Issue, US Here is another indication that the defense of social wages won in the past may be the strike issues of the future. Of course this is just posturing right now, but I am surprised that the rail union leaders have gone this far. Clinton's second administration is just a day old. Jon Flanders CLEVELAND, January 20 -- To protect occupational disability benefits for rail employees in the United States, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) and other national rail unions are prepared to strike at 9:00 a.m. this Wednesday, January 22. The unions are seeking the removal of U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Chairman Glen Bower from the board; his post is deemed neutral along side the board's labor and management members. Mr. Bower was appointed by the White House. "For some time, Mr. Bower has not functioned as a neutral member of the Railroad Retirement Board, but instead he has acted as a second management member," announced BLE International President Clarence V. Monin. "His attack on occupational disability benefits is the most recent example. Once again, he has rubber-stamped a management proposal for unilateral changes, instead of facilitating labor-management solutions as the federal law requires. "Mr. Bower will do an honorable service to each party that seeks dialogue and joint solutions, if he resigns by this Wednesday's scheduled RRB meeting," the BLE president noted. "His removal however may be necessary, to keep unfair, unilateral changes in disability benefits from being implemented by the board." The BLE's National Mobilization Team worked during this past weekend to set up an orderly withdrawal of locomotive engineer services. The BLE's and the AFL-CIO Transportation Trades Department-Rail Division's call for Bower's removal came at an emergency meeting of the rail unions' top executives in Washington, D.C., on January 15. Rail Labor's vote was unanimous, except for the United Transportation Union's decision to abstain. The UTU stated that it abstained due to its concern that a court injunction against the strike would be sought by the railroads. However, the BLE and other unions agreed that if an injunction becomes reality, there will be other legal options available to protest Bower's presence on the RRB. --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005