Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 20:00:32 +0100
From: m-14970-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se (Hugh Rodwell)
Subject: M-I: Andrew A not complaining ...


Andrew writes:

>Interesting,
>
>Hugh disagrees with my argument clarifying Marxian theory and method, yet
>still manage to adopt it and use it against somebody else. But I'm not
>complaining. Hugh is learning stuff.

But it's the same old stuff. Not a word of concrete exemplification anywhere.

Which argument?

How clarify?

Learning what exactly?

Is Andrew trying to imply he's got some kind of monopoly on logic and
Marxist principle?

And since when has he been interested in the problem of the leadership of
the working class and its consequences?

I think Andrew A has got some kind of guru complex. I'd hate to be one of
his female students (or male for that matter). When I learn stuff, I
acknowledge it. I've been learning for a long time now, and not one jot or
tittle have I gleaned from Andrew A.

Cheers,

Hugh




     --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---