Date: 10 Mar 97 10:01:03 EST From: jonathan flanders <72763.2240-AT-CompuServe.COM> Subject: M-I: List Matters >>Actually, I am in favour of Adolfo and his allies having their own lists,in which they can exclude anyone they like. Marxism-International never had the purpose of keeping together people who don't even want to discuss anything with each other. My opinions are already a matter of public record, I made the original proposal of Marxism-International. I am certain that if people who don't agree with the charter of marxism-international, and who apparently insisted on posting to this list for reasons I don't know (perhaps not having a suitable alternative), have some space where they can have their rules as they like, all parties would benefit. It would make all of our lives easier.<<Zeynep T Jon Flanders: I would only add the observation that while I agree it would make our lives easier, and I would favor this solution, the parties concerned would soon tire of talking to themselves and likely come back to abuse us centrists and revisionists that confess to not knowing everything. But by all means let them try it if they want. >>I include two paragraphs from the charter of Marxism-International below,which sums up the purpose of this list. I truly believe that the problem of too many list subscribers having too much free time to spend in front of a computer, and little else to do, has compounded our problems. It is my personal opinion that people living in countries in which the on-going revolutionary struggle is dynamic and alive have different priorities than those that seem to have endless time to ruminate over questions, often but not always irrelevant, that are not possible to solve in a mailing list.<< I agree. The rail-workers forum I am involved with does not have the problem of this list. We have little time to waste on flaming. I am amazed that some of the train crew members working 60+ hours a week can manage to post at all. >>I also encourage members to choose a suitable list. Marxism-International will never exclude political currents that consider themselves to be on the side of the working class. Unfortunately, that means that we'll have subscribers that annoy and anger other subscribers. If you don't want to be annoyed, please do leave. << And when you get annoyed, keep in mind that some subscribers live in countries where mere words can get you locked up. >>The three post limit is there because it is too expensive to download hundreds of messages each day. Unless internet becomes dirt-cheap for us not living in the imperialist countries, the limit is going to stay.<< Without the three post limit I could not stay on this list. I am barely hanging on as it is. If the list grows I can see a two post limit, even one. In case anyone hasn't noticed, in the advanced capitalist countries, working families are hanging on by increasing the time spent at work, namely the two-paycheck household. The volume of the old M list drove me to distraction. Jon Flanders, using OzWin 2.12.1 --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005