Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 10:06:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Perrone <perrone1-AT-igc.apc.org> Subject: M-I: La Raza Unida Party and Chicano Nationalism So far in the cyber seminar on nationalism there has been little mention of Chicano nationalism. In most such discussions, the question of Chicano nationalism takes a back seat in importance to Black nationalism. I believe this is unfortunate because the Chicano struggle for liberation in many ways predates that of African Americans. The Chicano national question also raises the issue of the role of land in any struggle for liberation more directly than that raised by Black nationalism, since the Chicano people or their ancestors were actually on the land that now comprises the states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, and parts of Colorado and Oregon before any white settler stepped foot on this continent. It has been well-documented that the land now occupied by those states comprised the most fertile and mineral-rich lands of Mexico, and that the US government instigated a war with Mexico for the purpose of confiscating that territory. Only the determined resistance of the Mexican people and their allies prevented the US government from seizing more Mexican territory. Chicanos were and still are as much, if not more of the backbone of the production process in the Southwest as African Americans were and are in other parts of the US. Without the labor of Chicanos the mining wealth of the northern Mexican territories stolen by the US would not have been realized; in conjunction with Asian workers, there would be no railroads; and the reputation of this country as an agricultural Mecca would not stand. My purpose here is to focus on one aspect of Chicano nationalism, the La Raza Unida Party (LRUP), mention of which has been made in previous posts on the national question. Chicano college students affiliated with the Mexican American Youth Organization (MAYO) first formed LRUP in south Texas in 1970. These students, the most prominent of whom was Jose Angel Gutierrez, were immediately influenced by the Black civil rights struggle of the 60s, the land grant disputes in New Mexico led by Reies Lopez Tijerina, the farmworker's struggle, and the high school walkouts in East Los Angeles in 1968. They were responding to the total lack of influence Chicanos had in the political process throughout the towns of southern Texas. They believed that decisions effecting Chicanos should be made by Chicanos, which to them meant control of governing bodies and institutions. Chicanos comprised majorities in many of those towns yet the local governing bodies were completely controlled by Anglos. Additionally, Chicanos were segregated in housing, education, and in public facilities. Historically, throughout southern Texas, the Texas Rangers had played a similar role as the KKK in the South, discouraging Chicanos through terror from participating in the political process. Their emphasis was on grass roots organizing. They understood that the conditions of migrant laborers, many of whom were Chicanos, made participation in the electoral process difficult. The thinking among these young activists was that while it was often difficult to be able to distinguish between a good and bad Anglo politician, the people definitely knew a Garcia from a Smith. Their first efforts proved successful beyond expectations, as Chicanos took over local school boards and town governments. Word of their success spread and soon there were LRUP chapters in Colorado and California. It was in the barrio of East Los Angeles that LRUP would be forced to confront the issue of class versus nation. That will be the topic of my next installment. Robert Perrone --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005