Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 08:08:00 +0100
From: Chris Burford <cburford-AT-gn.apc.org>
Subject: Re: M-I: US Hegemony


OK I did not follow fully the thread on globalisation which I now regret,
but the fuss is about whether the great majority of subscribers from the
imperialist nations are complacent about opposing the imperialism of their
own ruling class, however socialist they are in words. It is by no means
tautological that someone in an imperialist country who considers
themselves a socialist, is anti-imperialist in deeds.

Chris Burford



At 06:41 PM 8/11/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Chris,
>
>	I'm a little confused by this message, as though someone
>suddenly came out with a long burst of argument about why don't
>we use the roman instead of the cyrillic alphabet or something. I
>didn't particularly follow the thread you are responding to, because
>the very question seemed tautological. I don't *know* any marxists
>who do not conceive of themselves as having as their very essence
>the opposition to U.S. imperialism. What is the fuss about?
>
>Carrol




     --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---