From: Michael Hoover <hoov-AT-freenet.tlh.fl.us> Subject: Re: M-I: Devaluation of educated skilled labour power Date: Sat, 2 Aug 97 18:46:50 18000 > The scramble for > further education to avoid sinking between the gratings is actually a > further intensification of labour even though the spread of education is > more democratic in its overall social implications. > Chris Burford mass higher education has contributed to the appearance of structural class change, while simultaneously reinforcing the fundamental relationship that classes have to one another as a result of the arrangement of production...in fact, the stratification function of higher ed in the US has been crucial: 1) elite universities; 2) state universities; 3) community colleges... A rapidly increasing student population that began in the US after passage of the post-WW2 GI Bill continued unabated for 3 decades... if the changing labor market transformed the system of higher ed, educational opportunities were created for a larger percentage of the population...people came to perceive - correctly in a lot of instances - such opportunities as offering the possibility of greater social mobility, financial security, personal growth, & social respect...dialetically, the expansion of higher ed served to sustain the dominant social order, but also provided benefits for many people who were previously denied them... The '70s were an important period in US higher ed because the demand for college-trained personnel began to recede, while post-secondary enrollment continued to increase...this increase was fueled by the entrance of larger numbers of women, minorities, and older students, and a surge of part-time students...educators euphemistically named these students "non-traditional"...they are more likely to be found in commuter state universities and community colleges...their increased presence testifies to the social impact of the civil and equal rights movements, and also indicates widespread belief in educational opportunity...their entrance coincided, however, with both a surplus of college-educated labor, and an economic crisis that resulted in funding shortages...and so-called "non- traditional" students, the last to gain access, have been the targets of educational retrenchment in an attack analogous to the practice of "last hired-first fired" in the workplace...so full-time college remains the domain of those most likely to adhere to elitist ideals & pursuits and working-class students are "tracked" into evening, part-time, or vocational programs if not out of school... higher education came under attack several decades ago because the labor process, with its monotony & fragmentation, penetrated a sector of society where individual identity & autonomy were thought the norm...universities adopted the language and organization of production & rational administration, thus, disclosing themselves as factors in the mode of production...students became politically active in spite of their education...their new social position led to protest & rebellion, much as the new social organization of work had led to the revolt of the factory worker during the industrial revolution...student organizing has always created special problems because the composition of the student body is always changing and, today, new difficulties exist...US student activists have tended to live near campus and outside their parents' home, and have been full-time students without the responsibilities of "adulthood"...an increasing number of students no longer fits this description...the so-called "non-traditional" student has less time for reflection... this person's over-all college experience is impoverished when compared to the "traditional" student...Michael --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005