Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 21:45:00 -0800 From: Mark Jones <Jones_M-AT-netcomuk.co.uk> Subject: M-I: Lenin The Met Office has announced the warmest British November since records began, with one freakish exception a century ago. Temperatures are averaging 65 deg. F. Global warming is writing in letters of fire: we cannot go on like this. Meanwhile life goes on unattended, a bathetic comedy acted by the unknowing dead. Thus FoE enthuses on Sustainability initiatives in the US. This is all to the good, and the concern of the average American citizen for her environment is laudable. But when sustainability is cycle lanes, bottle-banks, public transport initiatives and maybe the kind marginal greening of business which the Audubon report I posted speaks of: at best prefiguring the antithesis of capitalism, more probably just a pathetic footnote, then we have to conclude that the message is not getting thru. I have a large archive of photos from Russian history, mostly taken from the revolution, the thirties and world war 2. Among them is a famous group portrait of Russian capitalists, pompous and portly in spats, penguin suits and silk top hats, some smoking cigars, staring history impudently in the eye, seeming to ignore a conflagration that is flaring behind them. In reality it is nothing more ominous than a display by the Moscow fire brigade. The year is 1924, and these are Nepmen. But the picture might serve as an evil icon emblematising today's small groups of conspiratorial men (they are almost all men) whose behaviour is so perverse, so self-destructive, wilfully-blind and obstinately self-deluding, that they really might be devils. Sometimes I see Lucifer rampaging free. I felt Him the other day when I read some UN report that the world centre of traffic in women and white slavery is no longer some middle eastern entrepot or Thailand or Ecuador, but Russia. Some facts stick on the threshold of thought like a fishbone in the throat, and I cannot accept them. There is no justice, historical or personal, but there is plenty of nemesis around, most of it directed at the already-victimised. This is why many ordinary Russians (according to all the polls) hate capitalism, not just dislike it, and why there is so much bitterness, so much anger and indignation, mostly now directed at the US, among those who lost almost everything when they lost the Soviet Union. Anti-Sovietism still poisons this list, altho not as virulently as it did, and there are some (mostly American academics, I don't know why) still marinating in it, even (perhaps especially) on the so-called left. What they lack is poetry. Or empathy. Or plain ornery anger. That's their problem. I know Russia. I speak as I find. And I say: anyone who thinks that Russia has done with revolutions, is wrong. And that's what I mean about conspiracy. A fantastic process of concentration of wealth and power, unparalleled in human history, is racing ahead in parallel with the ominous rents and tears appearing in the fabric of the ecosphere. Last year less than $3bn inward investment flowed into sub- Saharan Africa. It's just fallen off the map. The former Soviet Union is becoming Biafra (remember Biafra?), its people doomed to the worst fate: owners of assets which their comprador (even semi-feudal, even in Russia) state busily plunders. East Asia has got asthma and maybe worse. Wherever you look it's the same. Countless millions unable to meet their elementary needs, and how can these submerged masses take an interest in global warming? As we have seen in the past three weeks, even marxisant intellectuals have a hard time getting their eyes on the ball when it comes to something as arcane as global warming. Yet for the first time since the time of John Reed and Louise Bryant, capitalism is in the shit, deep in, and digging deeper all the time. For the first time, the conspirators look like what they are: slavering, raving- mad monsters, depraved, endlessly corrupt, cynical, foul, inhuman, worthy of no fate but crushing under foot, and so shall they be. People mad enough to wreck a planet rather than give in. Our lives are ruled by criminals, gangster-politicians, gangster-bankers, priests, poets and filmmakers, people incensed with furious greed, the unspeakable in pursuit of the inalienable. They shall be dragged kicking and screaming to justice. They shall face the indignation and anger of the tired, the poor, the hungry and homeless, they shall face the wrath of the hollow-cheeked children deprived of a present, and even and perhaps most terrifying, the implacable anger of cosseted western middle class women whose loins shall produce no posterity capable of living in the ashes, on the barren soil. Therefore there never has been such a moment of revolutionary optimism as the present; but this is just the first hot breath of a scorching wind that is going to blow the whole thing away. What always connects the masses to history is anger: sheer, bloodyminded, violent, passionate, boiling rage. That's what fuels revolutions, and there is getting to be a lot of it about. The kind of anger that makes heroes of ordinary women and men, the kind of passion that fuelled October (when Kerensky wanted to crush the Bolshevik rising, it wasn't soldiers and sailors of the Petrograd garrison so much as these unarmed, simple people from the Vyborg Side who stopped him. While Kerensky mobilised cossacks of the Savage Division, Petrograd's workers organised to defend their revolution. On a snow-swept morning, 25 degrees below zero, thousands upon thousands of people, in thin, tattered clothes, with white pinched faces, women and men, even children, poured forth from the factories and working class quarters; with `infinite courage, infinite faith', as eye-witness Louise Bryant recorded, they marched out `untrained and unequipped to meet the traditional bullies of Russia, the paid fighters, the paid enemies of freedom.' No-one knew where the advancing cossacks were so they followed the sound of gunfire rolling back from the battlefield. These were the working-class women who on International Women's Day, eight months before, began the revolution that overthrew the Tsar. Angelica Balabanova said to Bryant of their passionate courage: `Women have to go through such a tremendous struggle before they are free in their own minds that freedom is more precious to them than to men.' ) But without a Party that is truly theirs, that speaks to and for them, that articulates their passion and understands the world of toil, what will become of these people ofthe abyss? They are the "tyomniye silyi", dark forces, poorest of the poor proletarians and peasants who rallied to the Bolsheviks, to Lenin, who never wavered, are still present in history, now as before October, a vast sullen inscrutable crowd of spectators, waiting for their moment to arrive, and in Russia still (as we see in the mass rallies of the Communists) true to the banner of Lenin, despite all that has happened and not happened these eighty years. Intellectuals can propose, in the midst of their isolation, fear, self- distrust. But it is the people who dispose. They chose the Bolsheviks and not from whimsy or sentimentality but because they needed this instrument of self-emancipation as much as they needed such things as peace, bread, land. It was their party. They made it their own. It spoke for them; they trusted it; their faith in it was infinite. When their party was stolen from them, they did not lose faith in the idea of it, because that has already entered the human lexicon of eternal truths. The idea of such a party, the party of a new type, cannot and will not die. As will be seen. --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005