Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:59:40 +1000 (EST) From: Gary MacLennan <g.maclennan-AT-qut.edu.au> Subject: Re: M-I: Re: On Lenin. On Moderators, the Internet, etc. etc. At 09:49 PM 1/18/98 +0000, you wrote: >In message <199801181706.MAA16900-AT-pobox.ids.net>, Louis R Godena ><louisgodena-AT-ids.net> writes >> >>Gary writes: >> >>> The question is do we want >>>as moderator someone who is essentially a negative force. I say no and >>>would add that I think it is a scandal that we have not worked out a >>>democratic method of electing moderators for a fixed period... >> >> >>The "question" for me is whether we should allow a homogenous handful of >>ageing, western white radical men -- "yesterday's men", so to speak -- men >>engaged in or retired from practically identical professions outside of the >>working class to effect a Popery here at Marxism-International. >> >>I say "no". > >I agree with Louis G. Nobody has laid one charge against Louis G that >suggests he should not be moderator. What an utterly fruitless >discussion! What clarification is taking place in the ranting about >Pipes or Lenin? None at all. >-- >James Heartfield > > > --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- Listen, I have not commented on Godena's views on Lenin. though IMHO his attempt to assume him under the rubric of the 'will to power' is a routine and reductive exercise in Nietzscheanism. Similarly his Stalinism is not that of a Mark Jones or even of an Olaechea. Stalin is admired by Godena because of the absence of slave morality. But all this is beside the point. We should have elected moderators. This should be a democratic list. The truth is that it is not and that the pope is Godena himself. Heartfield sadly has become infected with the disease that Levy caught so badly. He has been exposed and bested in argument by Louis Proyect and now he has moved to the stage of "enemy". Hence the opportunistic endorsement of Godena. But let me repeat it so even the apostle of progress-at-all-costs will understand it. We should have elected moderators for a set period. Now read that James - see there is no reference to Lenin nor the Russian revolution. Nor is there any attempt to set up a hierarchy. In fact just the opposite. I want democracy. Get it? Gary MacLennan --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005