Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:01:19 -0500 (EST) From: louisgodena-AT-ids.net (Louis R Godena) Subject: Re: Which breach? was Re: M-I: British Social Democracy rushes into the breach (again) Gary writes: >Well I suppose it might as well be an Irishman that rides to the defence >of the British Left. Of course, who else? >I have had bitter words with Rodwell but he is no Blairite. In his >Trotskyist way he is a true revolutionary. So are in their differing ways >are Bos and Adam Rose. BTW I regard the latter as a friend and a good >comrade and I lament his absence from this list. C'mon, Gary. Anti-Communism is the one solid plank of the modern Trotsky program. It is the *only* reason they are promoted by imperialism, though with the demise of the Soviet Union, their services are coming at quite a discount. Rodwell lives neither on his feet or on his hands; he sits on his fat ass in an exclusive private school in Sweden and issues his dotty revolutionary pronouncements; Adam Rose is an SWPer, which means he has been on the same side of the class barricades as the imperialists (and, I might add, the fascists) since 1950, when Tony Cliff supported the bombing of Korean villagers by US B-29s ("We must not support bloody Russia"). Today, he traffics with assorted scum like Lech Walesa (who gives credence to the view that a genuinely "working class" government, left to its own inclinations, will by nature be fascist), the Afghan mujadaheen, and Hamas. As for Bos, personal experience shows that he well suited to his nickname from Mel Brooks' *History of the World, Part 1*. Oh, and you ask "which breach"? The breach left by a rapidly evaporating UN "coalition" that, for various reasons, can no longer stomach the Hitler-like behavior of Clinton and his "liberal" Democrats. As I said; time for the British Social Democrats to get on with it. Louis Godena --- from list marxism-international-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005